We performed a comparison between HPE System Management and Microsoft Configuration Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Microsoft, ServiceNow and others in Server Monitoring."The interface is in continuous development and improves version by version."
"The product's initial setup phase is easy with the help of the framework consisting of Microsoft Azure."
"This solution has improved our organization through the provision of efficient resource utilization and capacity planning."
"This is a good product and I recommend it."
"I think it's stable, scalable, and flexible."
"The managing and monitoring are the solution's most valuable features. They are something I find quite helpful in my work."
"The most valuable features are application deployment and task-sequenced imaging."
"It saves a lot of money when you can install things automatically and they are installed the exact same way on every computer."
"I have found the solution to be scalable. We have around 50,000 users using the solution."
"The most valuable feature of SCCM is the application distribution."
"Microsoft is being very competitive right now, and they are really investing in a lot of new features to be more competitive in the marketplace."
"With the right administrator, application deployment can do wonders."
"The main, clear valuable feature is updating the latest, patches and updates from Windows. This is the main feature we really utilize a lot."
"Microsoft has done a good job with authentication solutions, such as single sign-on, or open authentication."
"Our customers would like to see the price lowered."
"If the solution could provide better integration to make it easier to manage everything on different servers, that would be helpful. Whatever servers a company has, be it IBM, Dell, etc., if the System Management could be a platform that links all of them together, it would make management across different server types easier."
"The return on investment report is too difficult to understand."
"The quality of service and support for this solution needs to be improved."
"The product should increase the processing capacity and allow speedy deployment, as both of them are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"I think that support integration could be improved."
"They need to improve the support for the Mac operating system."
"The solution can be improved with the addition of a mobile device manager."
"I would like to see some improvements in WSUS and control of other, non-Microsoft, product updates."
"SCCM can improve on third-party application support."
"The solution is on-premises. The cloud version of the product, if a person needs to be on the cloud, would be InTune, which already exists as an option. SCCM doesn't need to offer cloud features for this reason."
"Cloud-based improvements need to be better managed."
"SCCM should strive to enhance the accuracy of its reporting functions in order to avoid any issues with incorrect or inaccurate data."
"The ability to integrate MDM would be great."
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
HPE System Management is ranked 19th in Server Monitoring with 8 reviews while Microsoft Configuration Manager is ranked 2nd in Server Monitoring with 78 reviews. HPE System Management is rated 8.2, while Microsoft Configuration Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HPE System Management writes " Offers reliability and helps with the virtualization part". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Configuration Manager writes "Seamless system updates, useful integration, and reliable". HPE System Management is most compared with Lenovo XClarity Controller, Zabbix and Tanium, whereas Microsoft Configuration Manager is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Intune, BigFix and Tanium.
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
