We performed a comparison between IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management."It helped with some of the regulatory requirements. It also helped with some of the security analytics and analysis. It was worthwhile from that perspective."
"The most valuable feature is that it provides a simple English recommendation on actions that you need to take once a vulnerability is discovered."
"The reporting features are good and there are many built-in reports that can be quickly configured."
"The solution is easy to use and configuration is smooth with no complexities."
"The interface is fine."
"It is pretty stable. I would rate it nine or maybe ten."
"A new user can easily understand the workflow, even if they are creating users for other divisions and the user is a beginner."
"The initial setup is very straightforward."
"It is easy to manage. Most of the information the tool provided helped to further investigate the vulnerability and its impact."
"There is no burden of updating or upgrading this solution."
"I would rate Tenable's dashboards and reporting capabilities for illustrating security posture a nine out of ten, with ten being the best."
"Building policies is not that easy. There are some things that are turned off by default, for example, displaying values."
"The interface could be improved by having sub-groups of tests, ultimately making the process of collecting tests faster."
"It was not as easy to use. The user-friendliness of it was somewhat lower than what I was expecting. It was also lacking in terms of the ease of the setup. There should be an automatic agent for deployment."
"Another area of improvement is customer service and support. Tenable needs to include support in the pricing/license. Currently, they push clients to get support from partners or channel distributors, who often charge a lot."
"The shortcoming of the solution that needs improvement is related to its capability to do vulnerability assessments on applications."
"Tenable could improve visibility into assets, including automated asset tagging. You should be able to automatically tag assets based on location, function, ownership, etc. That would help us because we spend a lot of time identifying and tagging assets by hand."
"They should include better customization of the dashboard, and integration tools."
"The product is a bit expensive."
"The solution seems to focus too much on enterprises, and they really need a product that works for SMBs."
"The price could be lower."
"The stability has room for improvement."
More IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is ranked 40th in Vulnerability Management with 3 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 38 reviews. IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is rated 6.6, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment writes "Worthwhile from the regulatory requirements and analytics perspective, but is expensive and not easy to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". IBM Guardium Vulnerability Assessment is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Acunetix, Rapid7 InsightVM and Orca Security, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
