We performed a comparison between IBM Rational Functional Tester and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools."The most valuable feature is the UI component tester."
"Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time."
"IBM Rational Functional Tester is very contextual."
"It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good."
"Visual Studio is an exemplary integrated development environment that stands out due to its exceptional features. It allows for the seamless selection of the appropriate programming language for the specific development tasks at hand. This facilitates a swift and effortless transition between languages, providing a highly efficient development experience."
"The most valuable features are the SSIS reports, the deployment models, and the ability to interact with other Microsoft tools."
"Visual Studio Test Professional's most valuable feature is the rich IDE for doing code and test development."
"Performance-wise, it is a great tool."
"Code testing is the most valuable feature of this solution for developing software."
"The solution is easy to use and they have also integrated with Microsoft."
"The user interface is very friendly."
"The ability to quickly make your own components has been valuable."
"As many of our products are moving from PC to mobile, the most important thing that this solution needs is mobile app support."
"They need to do a complete revamp so that even a non-technical person can manage the tool."
"The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run."
"If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility."
"The price could be improved."
"It would be great to support other languages and applications, and that is one of the things we can improve."
"It could be available for multiple platforms and other operating systems like Mac with a native port."
"I would like to see more integration in the solution."
"The product must provide more automation."
"Enhancing the support for web application testing and load performance would be an improvement."
"The interface should be made attractive."
"The solution's documentation could be improved because it keeps disappearing from the solution."
More IBM Rational Functional Tester Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Rational Functional Tester is ranked 21st in Functional Testing Tools with 8 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews. IBM Rational Functional Tester is rated 7.2, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Functional Tester writes "Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". IBM Rational Functional Tester is most compared with Selenium HQ, Katalon Studio, HCL OneTest, Tricentis Tosca and Worksoft Certify, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText UFT One.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
