We performed a comparison between Tricentis NeoLoad and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools."It is a good source for load, stress and performance testing."
"There aren't other solutions as competitive as Tricentis NeoLoad when it comes to the performance side."
"Tricentis NeoLoad is quite easy to use as compared to JMeter."
"We appreciate that this solution is very user-friendly, even if the user does not have a lot of protocol knowledge and experience."
"NeoLoad offers better reporting than most competing tools. It is effortless to analyze and measure the reported data. It's also simple to generate a report that most people can read and management can understand. NeoLoad helps you figure out the main issues inside the application."
"Tool for load testing and performance testing with good API support and good technical support. Tricentis NeoLoad is absolutely stable and scalable."
"It offered us an easy to use, limited code option for end-to-end performance testing."
"The scripting is really user-friendly and the reporting is very good."
"It is a very common and strong product. A lot of support is available for this product."
"It's great for the development of .NET."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a very scalable solution."
"Visual Studio is an exemplary integrated development environment that stands out due to its exceptional features. It allows for the seamless selection of the appropriate programming language for the specific development tasks at hand. This facilitates a swift and effortless transition between languages, providing a highly efficient development experience."
"The most valuable features are the SSIS reports, the deployment models, and the ability to interact with other Microsoft tools."
"Performance-wise, it is a great tool."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a scalable solution."
"Its initial setup process is easy."
"LoadRunner supports multiple protocols, whereas NeoLoad supports only three protocols. With NeoLoad, we can go for the SAP technology, web-based HTTP, and Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP). If I have to simulate .NET application-based traffic, I won't be able to do that. So, protocol support is a limitation for NeoLoad. It should support more protocols."
"We would like NeoLoad to be able to support more protocols. Testing can also be a little tricky at times."
"Most people focus on HTTPS or TCP, but it would be good to have support for a variety of different protocols."
"It needs improvement with post-production."
"The protocol support area could be improved."
"Support wasn't able to solve a technical issue."
"There is room for improvement with the support and community documentation as it can be difficult to find answers to questions quickly."
"Some users may find NeoLoad too technical, while other users may prefer a scripting language instead of a UI with figures and forms they have to fill in."
"The vendor must release a lightweight version of the solution."
"Visual Studio Test Professional could improve by having better integration with external databases."
"The solution's documentation could be improved because it keeps disappearing from the solution."
"Sometimes, the product is too complex to use."
"It would be great to support other languages and applications, and that is one of the things we can improve."
"Visual Studio Test Professional needs to improve its stability."
"Over the years, I haven't identified any specific enhancements that I desire; Visual Studio has consistently met my requirements seamlessly and flawlessly."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a little pricey."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 3rd in Performance Testing Tools with 60 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews. Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 8.2, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes "Supports SAP and non-SAP applications and helps identify performance issues before production deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Apache JMeter, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, Tricentis Tosca and Oracle Application Testing Suite, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, SmartBear TestComplete, TestRail and Tricentis Tosca.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
