We performed a comparison between IBM Security QRadar and Rapid7 InsightOps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the machine learning module."
"We are using the platform version, which I like."
"The UBA feature is the most valuable because you can see everything about users' activities."
"Most valuable features include the granularity of information."
"The correlation and the parsing are important features, since it is very important for a SIEM to have a good scalability and performance."
"We can easily monitor many things using this tool."
"IBM Security QRadar has significantly improved our incident response procedures."
"It protect us from multiple authentication values, unauthorized access and antivirus threats."
"It has the ability to alert and track logs from different sources."
"Integration of InsightOps with other tools, especially SIEM solutions, has generally improved operational efficiency."
"We can save logs as plain text."
"The most valuable feature of Rapid7 InsightOps is the search functionality."
"The ability to browse logs from multiple sources at the same time really speeds up root cause analysis."
"I have noticed a few things while working on this. After the restart of the server, sometimes, the services misbehave, and you need to manually start or restart the service. I have seen that specifically with the Tomcat service. Sometimes, when you click on log sources, instead of opening the log source extension, it redirects you over the internet."
"It would be good if the program allowed certain profiles to only see certain customer information."
"The dashboard is pathetic and it takes a long time to perform a search."
"The custom rules could be simplified more or it should be possible to use a different language, other than the ones that the solution is already using. They should add other languages into the mix."
"Their technical support is not good. We opened a lot of cases and from my experience, they are not complicated issues but it takes forever to get an answer."
"IBM needs to invest more into the collaboration with other vendors."
"It doesn't have a SOAR system by default. You need to purchase it additionally, which is the main problem with QRadar."
"GUI needs to be improved."
"Rapid7 InsightOps could improve by making the search query better. There are times when the search query is broken and it does not find anything."
"There are a few things I would like to do with a few more complex queries which I am not able to do right now, because it is a SaaS solution."
"Improvement is needed in the dashboard of InsightOps, especially for less technical users."
"Since I used the beta, improvements are to be expected. The dashboard options could have been clearer, but I believe it is more a problem with the limited documentation available at the time."
"The solution takes a little bit of time when we load the website for the first time."
IBM Security QRadar is ranked 6th in Log Management with 198 reviews while Rapid7 InsightOps is ranked 36th in Log Management with 9 reviews. IBM Security QRadar is rated 8.0, while Rapid7 InsightOps is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of IBM Security QRadar writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rapid7 InsightOps writes "Useful search functionality, easy to use, and reliable". IBM Security QRadar is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, Wazuh, LogRhythm SIEM and Elastic Security, whereas Rapid7 InsightOps is most compared with Wazuh, Datadog, New Relic, Splunk Enterprise Security and LogRhythm SIEM. See our IBM Security QRadar vs. Rapid7 InsightOps report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.