We performed a comparison between IIS and SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure."The solution is simple and very easy to manage compared to Linux."
"The solution is very easy to use and offers a quick deployment."
"The solution is the easiest way to publish applications which have been designed by older development tools."
"Microsoft's technical support has always been very good."
"The initial setup of IIS is easy. The process takes only five minutes."
"The tool shows us the operating systems where our servers and applications are running."
"It's good and offers good usability."
"The solution integrates well with most Microsoft products."
"From the use of this solution, we have been able to establish better processes and have greater management of our company."
"Internal workflow approval around ESS and MSS leave days, capex approval as well as internal communication to the business have improved the way my organization functions."
"Workflow functionality and internal portal capabilities are the most important features."
"They integrated it with the SAP router."
"IIS's memory management could be improved."
"IIS could improve by having some features related to ASR and HTTPS certificate generation."
"I am using an older version of Windows Server IIS and the general management and navigation to get something done is not as straightforward as I hope it to be. The interface could be improved."
"IIS could improve by Microsoft Windows improving the update services. We would like to be able to update all systems that are connected. The WSA service has to be in good order to accomplish this."
"The platform's stability could be better."
"The solution's scalability needs improvement."
"The solution should improve the cluster environment and load balancing."
"Sometimes, we encounter difficult issues, and getting support from Microsoft to resolve those issues is not easy."
"We encountered stability issues, especially on external functionality around its RFP capabilities."
"Due to our business, some setups were very complex."
"Our customers expect that a page will open within one second, and I doubt this will happen. Also, opening documentation takes time. Fixing this will help the customer and help to meet their expectations."
"External portal functionality with suppliers and customers needs improvement."
"The user interface could be improved by making it more user-friendly."
More SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IIS is ranked 1st in Application Infrastructure with 53 reviews while SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal is ranked 21st in Application Infrastructure. IIS is rated 8.0, while SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IIS writes " A simple and easy-to-use solution but not recommended for public apps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal writes "The UI makes the setup easy to do from anywhere". IIS is most compared with NGINX Plus, Apache Web Server, Oracle WebLogic Server, Tomcat and IBM WebSphere Message Broker, whereas SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal is most compared with Microsoft .NET Framework, NGINX Plus, Apache Web Server and IBM DataPower Gateway.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
