We performed a comparison between Imanami GroupID and SailPoint IdentityIQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two User Provisioning Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."For each job code, we go through and determine the access they're supposed to have to the system. Based on that job code, we use the query tool and say that anybody who is in this job code gets these groups added to them, or conversely, if they change job codes, it removes the ones that they shouldn't have and adds the one they should. That runs every night, and the next day, everybody has the job codes they're supposed to have."
"I have found the overall features to be useful."
"Imanami GroupID's UI is good."
"This solution has made our team more effective. We need less manual approvals when someone new joins our company. There is less paperwork and fewer support tickets raised for access."
"Provisioning in multiple environments."
"The community is very active and when I had questions about an issue, I was able to find the resources."
"We like the integration with other systems."
"Great product to manage the access control of users."
"Certifications and user provisioning features are the most valuable."
"Access certification and provisioning are two of the solutions most valuable features."
"One of the most valuable aspects of SailPoint is its open integration interface."
"The product's implementation is complex. It should also work on GPO."
"The mobile application needs to be improved and there should be chatbox features to allow users to easily reach out for assistance."
"I'd like to see a better user interface. It works, but it is clunky. There should be better import and export of LDAP queries and better management tools."
"Regarding the scope for improvement in the solution, reporting is an area that can be a bit more UI-oriented."
"One needs to understand that SailPoint is into full-fledged IAM practice with a long-term vision, and customers will get a quick ROI with best practices implementation."
"When it comes to queries and analysis, I find the reporting module to be very low, very simple."
"The user interface could be slightly improved. It could be made simpler and more user-friendly, however, it is good enough right now."
"There's a lot of customization required to improve the user experience."
"The solution's technical support team's response time and skills need improvement since it is an area where there are shortcomings."
"The connectors are far too manual. This needs to be automated a bit."
"Competitors are advancing by offering integrated solutions encompassing access and privileged access management in a single unified platform. IdentityIQ's focus has remained primarily on identity and access governance, neglecting to expand its offerings to include these additional functionalities within its existing product. Enhancing their product by incorporating modules for access management, privileged access management, and third-party access governance could address this gap."
Imanami GroupID is ranked 10th in User Provisioning Software with 3 reviews while SailPoint IdentityIQ is ranked 1st in User Provisioning Software with 61 reviews. Imanami GroupID is rated 8.4, while SailPoint IdentityIQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Imanami GroupID writes "Simplifies the task of managing groups and is affordable and easy to implement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SailPoint IdentityIQ writes "Flexible, easy to customize, and not too difficult to set up". Imanami GroupID is most compared with Netwrix Auditor and ManageEngine ADManager Plus, whereas SailPoint IdentityIQ is most compared with Saviynt, Microsoft Entra ID, One Identity Manager, ForgeRock and Okta Workforce Identity. See our Imanami GroupID vs. SailPoint IdentityIQ report.
See our list of best User Provisioning Software vendors and best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.
We monitor all User Provisioning Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.