We performed a comparison between Infobright DB and Oracle Database based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has very amazing smart grid query feature for very fast aggregate queries across millions of rows"
"Technical support is great."
"Oracle Database has good performance dynamics with respect to oncoming data and fetching of data which gets loaded."
"It enables us to comply with our security guidelines, and it is automated."
"The tool's most valuable feature is data encryption. The security features are good. They include field-level security, role-level security, and easy access controls."
"I like that it's stable. What's good is that Oracle manages the infrastructure. We have got better because they update the server by default or whenever it's needed. They try to fix it server by server because of their own support plans."
"The autonomous database simplifies everything."
"The thing two things that I like most about Oracle Database are its scalability and performance."
"I love the performance tuning feature of Oracle Database because it provides hints and indexing, which are very valuable. Some of its other valuable features are its rack, record key vaults, and backup compression."
"Only the data from the columns that reached 2GB will actually decrease. Other columns below 2GB in size do not leave the disk."
"The software really doesn't need any improvement, but the way they do the billing should be improved. They charge by all the chips on the server, whether you use them or not. If you have a server that has 64 chips on it and you use one chip, they charge you for 64, and that's a terrible business model."
"Oracle is a costly product, and it requires a lot of resources."
"Problems can arise if there are too many requirements or a lot of details which must be applied to connect the software to the database."
"There are a lot of additional costs. That is the reason we are only leveraging for transactional related purposes, so that we do not spend so much on doing the same thing on Oracle. That is the reason we are looking for open source databases now."
"We believe that the usability could be improved, especially within the data lakehouse. We found content management to be a little bit more simpler within the GUI part."
"The solution could have better security and integration."
"Digital support of the product could be improved."
"Oracle is not easy to integrate with other systems, which is something that should be improved."
Earn 20 points
Infobright DB is ranked 30th in Relational Databases Tools while Oracle Database is ranked 2nd in Relational Databases Tools with 282 reviews. Infobright DB is rated 7.6, while Oracle Database is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Infobright DB writes "If you need a real big data solution, look for a distributed solution that actually has a proven track record". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database writes "Supports a large volume of transactions compared to other databases". Infobright DB is most compared with MySQL and LocalDB, whereas Oracle Database is most compared with SAP HANA, SQL Server, MariaDB, IBM Db2 Database and Amazon Aurora. See our Infobright DB vs. Oracle Database report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.