We performed a comparison between Infobright DB and Teradata based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has very amazing smart grid query feature for very fast aggregate queries across millions of rows"
"It's very, very fast"
"Teradata's capabilities enhance data management efficiency, support scalability, and contribute to faster query performance."
"The most valuable feature of Teradata is security. It runs on Unix and Linux platforms which provide better security."
"Parallel processing features have helped to easily dump any size of data and retrieve data with great performance."
"I've never had any issues with scalability."
"Improved performance of ETL procedures, reporting."
"The most valuable features are the Shared-nothing architecture and data protection functionality."
"The ability to handle machine data parallel processing is the most valuable feature of Teradata."
"Only the data from the columns that reached 2GB will actually decrease. Other columns below 2GB in size do not leave the disk."
"The solution could improve by having a cloud version or a cloud component. We have to use other solutions, such as Amazon AWS, Microsoft Azure, or Snowflake for the cloud."
"Teradata can improve the way it handles big data and unstructured data."
"Teradata could improve by being less complicated. There are some aspects that are not available on the Unix server and a Unix system is required to access some data, such as in case of an emergency."
"The scalability could be better. The on-premises solution is always more complicated to scale."
"The increasing volumes of data demand more and more performance."
"The SQL Assistant is very basic. This tool can be improved for usability."
"The solution is stable. However, there are times when we are using large amounts of data and we can see some latency issues."
"There is a need to improve performance in high transaction processes, as well as the reporting system."
Earn 20 points
Infobright DB is ranked 30th in Relational Databases Tools while Teradata is ranked 7th in Relational Databases Tools with 54 reviews. Infobright DB is rated 7.6, while Teradata is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Infobright DB writes "If you need a real big data solution, look for a distributed solution that actually has a proven track record". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teradata writes "Offers seamless integration capabilities and performance optimization features, including extensive indexing and advanced tuning capabilities". Infobright DB is most compared with MySQL and LocalDB, whereas Teradata is most compared with SQL Server, Snowflake, Oracle Exadata, MySQL and BigQuery. See our Infobright DB vs. Teradata report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors and best Data Warehouse vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
You are asking about front end tools but you do not mention which ones. What you have are "database backends" and each has different features. The utilization will depend on what kind of expertise you have available else you will end up trying to implement say, Teradata on Exadata which may not give you the best solution. What are your criteria for success? Based on these you will have to evaluate each solution -- I am sure each vendor will be happy to set up the environment and work with your set of sampl,e data to show you have they evaluate against your criteria.
Given we partner with many or all of the above, or can get to them as we access all data, I have the following opinion - InfoBright is very new and probable to be sold long term. It is also an expensive subscription so presents highest risk to me. Exidata is Oracle - if you like Oracle and their style, it maybe ok, but then it is Oracle. Microsoft is Microsoft - tends to be cheap to acquire and expensive to implement and maintain. Teradata is pricey but of the group presents the least risk and the greatest number of front end partners. The product I represent is unique as it is designed for high complexity large numbers of users and data and runs inside Teradata taking better advantage of the architecture.
Disclosure: I work for Information Builders