We performed a comparison between Informatica Axon and OneTrust DataGovernance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Governance solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution allows the complete governance process, starting from the data quality, those definitions, and it can get the data quality in the EDC."
"It is a very stable solution. I rate its stability a ten out of ten...It is a scalable solution...Informatica Axon's technical support is good."
"The features for data quality, data cataloging, and UI are excellent."
"It is a scalable product."
"The product's most valuable feature is the ability to select the data flow and lineage."
"Axon does one interesting thing that I don't think other tools do as well. It lets you rate data and incorporates Informatica's data quality feature into it. There are little indications and graphics that show you how good the data quality is, and you can drill into it to see where potential issues lie."
"The feature of auto-onboarding of the assets, enterprise assets via EDC is good."
"The most valuable feature of Informatica Axon has been the data marketplace."
"This product makes it easy to manage personal data."
"One valuable aspect of the solution is its cloud-based nature. Users can just pay the fees and get started instantly."
"The tool gives us the ability to trace the path of an incident."
"Right now, although they offer some templates, I would want more templates available to be imported."
"There are some limitations with Informatica Axon when one tries to connect or integrate it with Jira."
"Some functionalities can be a challenge in the cloud."
"The on-prem version's functionalities may not be available on the cloud version."
"There are also some technical issues sometimes with integrations because clients have a lot of different types of data sources."
"The stability and the integration of the solution have room for improvement."
"Permissions, scalability, and connection with other informatic tools are the main areas that need development. Integration with other tools, such as IDQ, is challenging. The management of data discovery is highly challenging because many data points have identical definitions."
"The cloud version of Axon is far behind the on-prem, and many of my clients want to go fully to the cloud. However, Axon has to be an on-prem installation. I would like to see their cloud products catch up with their on-prem capabilities."
"Deployment is a big issue."
"The integration with third-party products could be better."
"The tool is an amalgam. It's a collection of loosely integrated pieces and parts that don't work well together. There is room for improvement there. My team reached out to the support team, and their experience was not satisfactory."
Informatica Axon is ranked 3rd in Data Governance with 23 reviews while OneTrust DataGovernance is ranked 24th in Data Governance with 3 reviews. Informatica Axon is rated 7.8, while OneTrust DataGovernance is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Informatica Axon writes "It has a marketplace that allows you to showcase all the assets the data owner has". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OneTrust DataGovernance writes "Good cloud-based solution requiring improvement in terms of integration". Informatica Axon is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Governance, Collibra Governance, Alation Data Catalog, BigID and Varonis Platform, whereas OneTrust DataGovernance is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Governance, BigID, Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager, Varonis Platform and Alation Data Catalog. See our Informatica Axon vs. OneTrust DataGovernance report.
See our list of best Data Governance vendors.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.