We performed a comparison between Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The data integration and synchronization features in IICS improve the data handling processes."
"The feature I found most valuable in Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services is the mapping. You just drag, and it maps the data. Mapping is very easy, and it's no code. When you migrate data or when the data interaction happens at the source and destination, the challenge is that you'll get different formats. The validation has to be done in the middleware, and the transformation should happen. In Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, it's very easy to do data validation and transformation compared to any other tool."
"This solution allows you to easily access and make use of information that you have in your on-premises environment."
"I rate the solution's scalability a ten out of ten."
"Logic Apps is valuable because my team uses it for integrating SaaS tool sets."
"The product has efficient connectors."
"The solution is very easy for new users because it includes very good documentation and transparency."
"If there's something that isn't possible, you can write some code and call that code from a Logic App."
"I am impressed with the tool's UI and analytics."
"Easy to use and is able to integrate with other Azure-based environments."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a nine out of ten, with ten being easy to set up."
"The prebuilt connectors available for SAP are really useful."
"This service could be more cost-effective."
"The product's pricing is definitely an area where a bit of improvement is needed."
"Synchronicity is an area for improvement in Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services. For example, when you want real-time or immediate response from the solution when multiple technologies are involved, the integration with Informatica Intelligent Cloud isn't seamless, whether it's the MQ, JMS, or BES service, so the connectivity should be improved a bit. The data governance is good, but what's lacking is a demo. For example, if there's a new feature in Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services, the documentation for that new feature is limited, so if Informatica could give a more complete documentation and more demos, that would be better for the users. Right now, there isn't any issue with any of the features of the solution. It's the new feature awareness or user training, and improved connectivity that I'd like to see in the next version of Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services."
"There's definitely room for improvement in terms of user-friendliness. One example is that you can't search for jobs directly by file name. You can only search by job name. So, if you want to find a job that works with a specific file, you have to go through each job individually to find the right one. So, I'd like to see a faster search, one where I can search directly by file name."
"A room for improvement in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is that it's expensive. Every step is going to cost you money, so if someone is not doing the steps carefully, at the end of the day, it will cost a lot of money. Each time you execute a step, the cost will depend on how much you use Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, and how many workflow steps you have. Each time a step needs to be executed, there'll be a cost added to your bill. If the developer isn't careful with how he uses the solution, this can blow up the cost. What I'd like to see in the next release of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is for the cost and security to be better."
"It's for a limited kind of application or short Apps. And, not for the complex applications."
"There could be more AI features included in the product."
"Pricing and handling asynchronous processes are the two main areas that need improvement."
"The solution lacks sufficient connectors."
"Not all connectors are readily available, though. There are two types: managed connectors and app connectors. Some connectors require you to provide a username and password to connect to platforms like SharePoint or Salesforce. Due to security constraints, some users may prefer not to use these connectors. Instead, they might opt for the HTTP connector."
"It would be beneficial to have less code and tighter integration between different cloud services."
"An area of improvement I've encountered is related to the number of connectors available in Logic Apps. While there are many connectors, I found that the "send email" connector may not work as expected, and one has to rely on Office 365 plugins or other alternatives. This could enhance user experience, especially when considering the additional overhead and licensing requirements associated with Office 365. It also needs to improve security features."
More Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services Pricing and Cost Advice →
Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services is ranked 14th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 4 reviews while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is ranked 2nd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 29 reviews. Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services is rated 8.2, while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services writes "Good tool, especially if you're using cloud services and an S3 bucket". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps writes "Has different connectors for workflow and comes with low-code feature". Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services is most compared with , whereas Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Boomi AtomSphere Integration, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Cloud Platform and Workato. See our Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
