We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Oracle Integration Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's easy to use, and it's stable."
"I am impressed with the tool's UI and analytics."
"What I found most valuable in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is that you can run a workflow or do a high-level process orchestration, then you can call the other function and fulfill the process. For example, if you want to update a customer, you first need to get the customer's phone number and simulate the steps of the process, then Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can orchestrate that process."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is the many available connectors that make automation easy. Additionally, the security of the solution is good."
"Easy to use and is able to integrate with other Azure-based environments."
"The product's most valuable feature is scalability."
"The product’s most valuable feature is integration."
"The solution is very easy for new users because it includes very good documentation and transparency."
"The most important part would be the use of connectors. The significant number of cloud connectors available for active integration is its value."
"The initial setup of Oracle Integration Cloud Service was easy."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service offers a lot of adaptors."
"In general, there were a lot of great utilities for working with files."
"OIC's accuracy is quite good."
"I particularly like the drag-and-drop feature for designing integrations and processes."
"It's easy to build an integration and make changes to it."
"Technical support responds quickly."
"A room for improvement in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is that it's expensive. Every step is going to cost you money, so if someone is not doing the steps carefully, at the end of the day, it will cost a lot of money. Each time you execute a step, the cost will depend on how much you use Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, and how many workflow steps you have. Each time a step needs to be executed, there'll be a cost added to your bill. If the developer isn't careful with how he uses the solution, this can blow up the cost. What I'd like to see in the next release of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is for the cost and security to be better."
"The pricing could be improved."
"The product needs improvement in getting direct access to the code and versioning."
"The standard logic app could be simplified. Thats what we would like to see in the next release."
"Especially when using a function or a parameter, that could be easier as that's not very well-documented, and it's not very clear from the tool itself how to use it."
"An area of improvement I've encountered is related to the number of connectors available in Logic Apps. While there are many connectors, I found that the "send email" connector may not work as expected, and one has to rely on Office 365 plugins or other alternatives. This could enhance user experience, especially when considering the additional overhead and licensing requirements associated with Office 365. It also needs to improve security features."
"Not all connectors are readily available, though. There are two types: managed connectors and app connectors. Some connectors require you to provide a username and password to connect to platforms like SharePoint or Salesforce. Due to security constraints, some users may prefer not to use these connectors. Instead, they might opt for the HTTP connector."
"The visual tool that is used to build integration is quite old."
"The bulk processing needs improvement."
"Oracle-based automation blueprints for the majority of the integrations would be helpful to have in a future release."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service can improve file handling. Currently, our real-time file polling limitation is 10 MB, if that size can be increased it would be helpful. For example, increasing the size from 10 MB to 1 GB."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service can improve the downloading and uploading of files. I've submitted this issue to the Oracle Idea Labs. The issue is from the front end of Oracle Integration Cloud, we cannot download or upload a file directly or drag and drop it."
"The solution is expensive."
"We would love to have more and more ready-to-use interfaces from Oracle."
"They should provide tutorials for beginners to learn about the processes."
"The solution's customer service could be better."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is ranked 2nd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 29 reviews while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is rated 8.0, while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps writes "Has different connectors for workflow and comes with low-code feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Boomi AtomSphere Integration, SAP Cloud Platform, Workato and webMethods.io Integration, whereas Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), AWS Glue, Mule Anypoint Platform, Oracle GoldenGate and SAP Cloud Platform. See our Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. Oracle Integration Cloud Service report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.