We performed a comparison between Informatica MDM and SAS MDM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, TIBCO, Reltio and others in Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions."It gives you accountability to centralize your data and have it available to different applications."
"The most valuable features of Informatica MDM are its reliability, match functions, and integration capabilities. The out-of-box functionality of deduplication and built-in data models ensure faster implementation."
"MDM doesn't require a separate IDQ."
"Informatica MDM stands out as a tool that can give you the flexibility needed for doing channel-specific data quality or business validation."
"The most valuable features of Informatica MDM are it is cloud-enabled and has all the elements that are supposed to have in terms of MDM as a solution. All the features that are there. It is very well-integrated with any of the SAP and non-SAP applications. It is quite user-friendly. The user experience that you receive in Informatica MDM is quite good."
"It has been leading the market with hierarchy management and all the different match concepts and algorithms. They're very robust."
"Informatica MDM's most valuable feature is the interconnection between multiple Master Data domains."
"I like that Informatica MDM has robust matching technology. Informatica MDM is also porting the external Java applications for validations. I can consider that a must-have. It is also exposed to Rest API calls, and we can engage in real-time integrations with any third-party systems."
"One good feature is that SAS MDM comes bundled with the entire stack so we are in a position to place it with the client. So when a client wants an analytics tool plus BI, and they want to bring in other elements, that is when we look to MDM, because it is a single vendor."
"Informatica's issue is the licensing. Right now, there are a lot of new gen MDMs that are offering a lot in a single licensing model."
"From multiple masters that are there in Informatica MDM, we can improve the financials."
"Informatica MDM has limitations with connectivity."
"Their support should be improved. We have had some trouble with their support from time to time. Its scalability should also be improved. I would also like to have a bit more modern and friendly UI for the end-users. There should definitely be a simplified way to configure and set it up."
"The on-prem solution is harder to learn than the cloud-based versions."
"The tool should provide a unified user interface to manage the data objects."
"Informatica MDM could be improved by adding drag and drop options, business data insights, and visualization reporting."
"It could be a bit more intuitive, rather than technically complex."
"The initial setup was slightly complex. We did face a couple of issues such as the SAML integration not being very smooth. And linking communication with the metadata server was a bit of a challenge. Eventually, we were able to configure it properly."
Earn 20 points
Informatica MDM is ranked 1st in Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions with 43 reviews while SAS MDM is ranked 16th in Master Data Management (MDM) Software. Informatica MDM is rated 8.0, while SAS MDM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Informatica MDM writes "Optimize business processes while ensuring that users see a return on their investment from the use of the product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS MDM writes "When a client wants an analytics tool plus BI, that is when we look to this solution". Informatica MDM is most compared with Reltio Cloud, SAP Master Data Governance, Profisee, IBM InfoSphere MDM and Informatica Supplier 360, whereas SAS MDM is most compared with Profisee, Microsoft MDS and IBM Master Data Management on Cloud.
We monitor all Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.