We performed a comparison between Informatica MDM and TIBCO EBX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the number of options that are presented with Informatica, fuzzy matching, and your screen."
"New tools are coming out that will enable you to achieve 90 percent of use cases with the out-of-the-box configuration, but I would like to keep Informatica tight here. Otherwise, you need a Java user edit course and other things to do multiple things that you cannot configure out of the box. They have to go through those use cases to do something if those can also be configured rather than coded."
"Address Doctor gives an accurate combination of information provided with a level of returned threshold value."
"It gives you accountability to centralize your data and have it available to different applications."
"The ability to aggregate and put together data from around fifty sources into one environment allows us to have a preview of everything in a single place, which is something we did not have previously in our company."
"We can see all our information on a single screen."
"This is where I think MDM shines - with its strong fuzzy matching algorithm. This is the essence of Informatica MDM. Based on these results, I can write our match conditions and then perform the corresponding data management activities."
"MDM is very stable - it can handle millions of hits daily and still run 24/7."
"The API and the data model are very valuable features."
"The initial setup is easy and straightforward."
"The product is extremely flexible."
"This solution allows the user to have complete control, and is 100% customizable."
"It is a very stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"There are a lot of possible use cases for this Master Data Management tool."
"The data quality is very good."
"The data modeling is very good."
"Informatica MDM could improve the interdependency with integration. The solution sometimes becomes a bit difficult to change considering a lot of interdependency with the integration. There can be some improvement in the workflows and they can introduce more artificial intelligence."
"Needs to implement the new workflow with simple steps and a quick visualization with a 360 view of the data."
"Their support should be improved. We have had some trouble with their support from time to time. Its scalability should also be improved. I would also like to have a bit more modern and friendly UI for the end-users. There should definitely be a simplified way to configure and set it up."
"Inserting the GenAI into the master data management will reduce the overall effort of operational activities."
"The product could be improved in the area of architecture and technology. All the parts are old."
"The configurations could be better. It is a bit confusing because we must develop two tools when building a data model in Informatica MDM. Even though Informatica MDM is a single tool, we have our hub console plus the provisioning tool within that. Whatever data model we are building in the hub console, we have to develop it in the provisioning tool again. It is double the work to create a data model. We are also using external calls or the Java custom plans functions. This can be both positive and negative. Since MDM as a client does not support any complex validation, we have to depend on the external call or a Java call. Every time we deployed, the entire solution was impacted if something went wrong."
"The integration could be a bit better. The process is something new."
"I feel the out-of-the-box APIs or the API management could be improved slightly from their current state. It could be more user-friendly."
"The support isn't great and takes too long. And the pricing can be improved."
"The tool has to improve mapping and workflow. It should be made more robust."
"The product does not scale well horizontally. We find the scalability to be quite inferior to other options."
"Currently, users can't use Plain SQL queries in TIBCO EBX."
"The initial setup can be a bit complex."
"We would like to see the community an documentation for this solution be developed. At present there is very little tutorial documentation available, and limited community support for issues with the product."
"Everything is updated through forms, and working with UI web forms. It's more record-based processing. It is not mass-based processing. This is one of the things that are not good for TIBCO EBX. Another problem is we cannot join tables and prepare a view where the tables are joined. Someone can code it but it is not a feature of the solution without code. You have to take data from a table, combine it with data from another table and then present it. This could be done better."
"In terms of improvements that this solution needs, it should support big data."
Informatica MDM is ranked 1st in Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions with 43 reviews while TIBCO EBX is ranked 2nd in Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions with 14 reviews. Informatica MDM is rated 8.0, while TIBCO EBX is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Informatica MDM writes "Optimize business processes while ensuring that users see a return on their investment from the use of the product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO EBX writes "Good workflow models and pull-down lists with very good data modeling". Informatica MDM is most compared with Reltio Cloud, SAP Master Data Governance, Profisee, IBM InfoSphere MDM and Microsoft MDS, whereas TIBCO EBX is most compared with SAP Master Data Governance, Reltio Cloud, Stibo STEP MDM, Informatica PIM and Microsoft MDS. See our Informatica MDM vs. TIBCO EBX report.
See our list of best Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.