We performed a comparison between Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center and SAP Signavio Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Design solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processes. There are two valuable aspects. First, setting up the process architecture is commendable. Second, not having to maintain different versions of processes is a notable benefit. The solution is stable. The support team is responsive."
"The most valuable feature is the integrated manner in which all the capabilities of the Enterprise Process Center platform work together and make it easier to complete the documentation of processes."
More Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center Pros →
"Process management/Process governance is what we think Signavio is very good at."
"It is a scalable solution."
"I use SAP Signavio Process Manager to model processes to the former operating model."
"The GUI is very easy to use, where you can sit together with your colleagues, discuss the process, and during these discussions you can build up the model."
"I love the collaboration function, especially the option to invite people who don't have any users on the licenses."
"A complete business project management suite which seems to open endless possibility."
"The product's most valuable feature is the transformation process."
"I would say the collaboration features are very useful to us, because we are a European organization, so we are not in one location. This is an easy way to share with other people and ask them for feedback. That is the use case for us."
"As with all such platforms, Enterprise Process Center is a complex tool and there are many capabilities and features that take time to learn."
"However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights into process functionality. Additionally, there's always room for enhancement in the user interface."
More Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center Cons →
"I would like to see the inclusion of some document management functionality so that we don't need to integrate with a second solution to accommodate this."
"It is difficult to quickly digest the vast power of the suite and make use of those capabilities fully."
"I would like to be able to link a single word within a textual description directly to the glossary."
"It is sometimes difficult to find the match between what is possible and what is wanted, or what is helpful with the product, so better documentation may assist in this regard."
"If you start from scratch then I think this product would be ideal, but if you already have something then it may or may not suit you."
"SAP Signavio Process Manager needs better automatic rendering of data."
"Signavio Process Manager needs to have an integrated document management system to better work with processes that rely heavily on documents and document flows."
"The performance metrics appearing in the collaboration hub needs to be improved."
More Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center Pricing and Cost Advice →
Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center is ranked 20th in Business Process Design with 2 reviews while SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 6th in Business Process Design with 57 reviews. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center is rated 9.0, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center writes "Highly integrated, user-friendly, and supports mobile devices". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Has many functionalities and is used to model processes to the former operating model". Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center is most compared with , whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Camunda, Visio and ADONIS. See our Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
