We performed a comparison between Ivanti Neurons for RBVM and Tenable Security Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management."Most of the features are similar to what other tools have, but the UIs are quite user friendly. A beginner could use it."
"Tenable's most valuable features are the credential scan, vulnerability reports, and vulnerability ratings (VPR)."
"I found the dashboard features very useful. It made it easy to track remediation progress. I could publish dashboards to remediation teams and track the progress on the dashboards."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the vulnerability assessment."
"The most valuable features of Tenable SC are scanning, reporting, dashboards, and automation."
"The tool gives us fewer false positives. Compared to its competitors, the solution’s reports are more accurate."
"What is useful to me is being able to fulfill very customized scanning policies. In the clinical environment, because of vendor control, we can't perform credential-vulnerability scanning. And network scans, which I've done before, can cause a lot of impact. Being able to create very customized policies to be able to routinely scan and audit our clinical networks, while simultaneously not causing impact, is important to us."
"The feature we've liked most recently was being able to take the YARA rules from FireEye and put them into Tenable's scan for the most recent SolarWinds exploit. That was really useful."
"The solution is one of the most, if not the most, stable product available."
"I would also like to see more integrations, plugins, and user-friendly automation, similar to the multiple integration scripts that Rapid7 has."
"A good plugin editor would be a good additional option for the Security Center."
"Tenable's reporting engine needs improvement. It needs to be more efficient and add more features."
"We would like to see the inclusion of external IPs and simplified reporting that's easier to deal with"
"In terms of configuration, there is some level of flexibility that we are not able to achieve."
"Deploying Tenable.sc is highly complex because it's an on-prem solution, whereas Tenable.io is cloud-based, so you can go live as soon as you log in. Tenable.sc involves significant integration with other on-prem solutions, and the deployment takes about two to three weeks with the help of a system integrator"
"The reporting side can be improved. The dashboards are nice, but exporting things out for reports for management was a little tough."
"Tenable has some problems with agents going offline during scanning and lag between agents and the security center."
"Current web page needs improvement, slows down processes."
Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is ranked 29th in Vulnerability Management while Tenable Security Center is ranked 1st in Vulnerability Management with 48 reviews. Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is rated 9.0, while Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Ivanti Neurons for RBVM writes "Useful for vulnerability management with many integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans". Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is most compared with Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Nessus and Vulcan Cyber, whereas Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Nessus, Rapid7 InsightVM and Horizon3.ai.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
