Ivanti Neurons for RBVM vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ivanti Logo
365 views|271 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Tenable Logo
13,052 views|10,471 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ivanti Neurons for RBVM and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, SentinelOne and others in Vulnerability Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Most of the features are similar to what other tools have, but the UIs are quite user friendly. A beginner could use it."

More Ivanti Neurons for RBVM Pros →

"Tenable.io, in particular, is quite a powerful product. It looks at your traditional environment, which is pretty much anything that is on-premises, and it also goes a step ahead and covers your modern assets, which is anything that is currently sitting in the cloud. You get complete visibility of your entire environment and tech operation. The ability to give you visibility across the entire tech surface is one of the biggest advantages that Tenable.io has.""The price of Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is reasonable as it is ten times cheaper than other options.""The initial setup is mostly straightforward.""It helps us create remediation projects and assign the console’s responsibility to specific engineers.""The initial setup is pretty straightforward.""Technical support has been good. They respond quite quickly.""It is easy to manage. Most of the information the tool provided helped to further investigate the vulnerability and its impact.""The vulnerability scanning is the most important aspect of the solution for us."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pros →

Cons
"I would also like to see more integrations, plugins, and user-friendly automation, similar to the multiple integration scripts that Rapid7 has."

More Ivanti Neurons for RBVM Cons →

"The solution must be promoted more in the market.""The one drawback that we have found is the reports.""The solution seems to focus too much on enterprises, and they really need a product that works for SMBs.""I would like the solution to cover the whole cycle of mitigation since it's an area where the solution currently lacks.""They should include better customization of the dashboard, and integration tools.""Tenable could improve visibility into assets, including automated asset tagging. You should be able to automatically tag assets based on location, function, ownership, etc. That would help us because we spend a lot of time identifying and tagging assets by hand.""It's not a user-friendly tool since it has a complicated interface.""The solution’s pricing could be improved."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "There are additional features that can be licensed for an additional cost."
  • "The solution is not too expensive."
  • "Tenable.io Vulnerability Management's pricing solution model isn't great."
  • "The total cost we pay for this solution is over 45K. This is for a large education organization."
  • "Compared to other VM solutions, Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is expensive."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high price, I rate the pricing an eight. So, it is a pretty expensive solution."
  • "Tenable.io is not known for being a cheap product."
  • "A yearly payment has to be made toward the solution's licensing costs."
  • More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Most of the features are similar to what other tools have, but the UIs are quite user friendly. A beginner could use it.
    Top Answer:They could add more widgets, similar to Rapid7 and InsightVM. I would also like to see more integrations, plugins, and user-friendly automation, similar to the multiple integration scripts that Rapid7… more »
    Top Answer:We use RiskSense for vulnerability management, and we have many integrations. The solution is deployed on cloud. We use this solution daily. There are more than 200 people using this solution in my… more »
    Top Answer: Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of the program is such that if a company should desire to handle the installation… more »
    Ranking
    32nd
    Views
    365
    Comparisons
    271
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    9.0
    2nd
    Views
    13,052
    Comparisons
    10,471
    Reviews
    28
    Average Words per Review
    460
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    RiskSense
    Tenable.io
    Learn More
    Overview
    Evolve your vulnerability management strategy to a risk-based approach. Ivanti Neurons for RBVM enables you to prioritize the vulnerabilities that pose the most risk to better protect against ransomware and other cyber threats.

    Managed in the cloud and powered by Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management (formerly Tenable.io) provides the industry's most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your organization. Built-in prioritization, threat intelligence and real-time insight help you understand your exposures and proactively prioritize remediations.

    Sample Customers
    Care First, City of Alburquerque, Electric Company El Paso, State of Arizona, Washington Gas
    Global Payments AU/NZ
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Healthcare Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Insurance Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Security Firm24%
    Government12%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization24%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government9%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business53%
    Midsize Enterprise3%
    Large Enterprise45%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise49%
    Buyer's Guide
    Vulnerability Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, SentinelOne and others in Vulnerability Management. Updated: April 2024.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is ranked 32nd in Vulnerability Management while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 39 reviews. Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is rated 9.0, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Ivanti Neurons for RBVM writes "Useful for vulnerability management with many integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is most compared with Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center and Rapid7 InsightVM, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management.

    See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

    We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.