We performed a comparison between Jamf Pro and Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."The dashboards, the security, and the customization capabilities work very well for us."
"The biggest thing for us is enforcing logins only from devices that are managed by Intune."
"The most valuable feature is the UEM capabilities."
"There is a single pane of glass for user access and a single sign-on facility for the user. If you have already logged in to Microsoft Azure or on-premises, you can redirect directly to Microsoft Endpoint Manager, monitor all your security threats, and analyze the data associated with the application in a single, unified way."
"The synchronization of Intune with other Microsoft solutions is a valuable feature."
"As the solution is a software as a service, the scalability is unlimited."
"Great for software update needs, operating system version updates, and security policy enforcement."
"It has improve our organization through the remote management of non-domain joined devices."
"There is also zero-day support to all new Apple OS."
"It offers professionals an endless amount of possibilities to keep users and the company happy."
"The fact that devices just need an internet connection [anywhere in the world] that allows them to check into the Jamf Software Server allows for identical management as if on campus or remote, has proven to be golden during the pandemic."
"The Self Service feature, which allows us to make apps available to our staff and students was essential."
"We were able to dramatically enhance our cybersecurity, and better support our users."
"The self-service is invaluable to the user."
"I like the ability to modify it to suit our environment and the fact that, since it's an Apple-dedicated service, the integration is easy."
"Some of the most valuable features for us include remote management, DEP enrollment, and zero-touch deployment."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the ability to assign a package to a user on a system If you have your software packages set up via SCCM. It automates the process, which is very convenient, especially since most of our people are remote. Additionally, the overall functionality is good."
"Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management offers on-premises deployment."
"The reporting and cost have room for improvement."
"Lacks the ability to deploy more ways of management, managing devices and processing the policies."
"There is still a gap between SCCM and Intune, especially in the reporting, inventory, and software deployment areas."
"Enhancements for managing MacOS more comprehensively would be beneficial."
"The installation is very easy. However, to be able to configure it you will need special knowledge, such as training or self-studies to have a proper level of security. There are many settings one has to understand before being able to implement Microsoft Intune."
"China blocks Google and Google Play Store, which makes installation challenging. Microsoft Intune is a company software, which has to be installed to the app portal or Microsoft Software Center."
"Microsoft Intune could improve by being more user-friendly and having it geared toward device management. The graphic interface is not very good."
"Microsoft Intune has a latency response time issue. The latency has room for improvement."
"The cheaper Jamf School is also a product that has been acquired and decked out to meet more educational needs for a good price. Some features of Jamf School aren't (yet?) available in Jamf Pro and for educational users/customers of Jamf Pro, it would beneficial to have these available in the Pro version too."
"Apple does block certain actions from happening or disallows Jamf from making certain changes."
"An easier way to deploy Full OS upgrades would be a great start."
"Jamf Pro currently is only used on Mac computers and could improve by having compatibility with other operating systems. We have to use other tools to manage our Windows and Android devices. There could be other improvements but I am still exploring and learning more about the features."
"It will be very helpful if we could restore users after they have been removed from Jamf because I have some cases of deleting a computer before unlocking it."
"Currently, you need to scroll through pages and pages of icons (we have many icons that have been uploaded), and it can be tedious."
"We need better reporting options."
"I would like to see improved integration of some of the additional tools that users create within Jamf itself."
"Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management could improve the user interface, it is not very intuitive."
"In terms of integration, there is still room for improvement in Matrix42."
More Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Jamf Pro is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 105 reviews while Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management is ranked 12th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 2 reviews. Jamf Pro is rated 9.6, while Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Jamf Pro writes "Customizable with a self-service portal and a good security posture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management writes "It is a complete and competitive solution with excellent OEM support". Jamf Pro is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, SOTI MobiControl, Microsoft Configuration Manager and IBM MaaS360, whereas Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management is most compared with Ivanti Neurons for MDM and ManageEngine Endpoint Central.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.