We performed a comparison between ManageEngine Endpoint Central and Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."Compliance and the policies that can be set are the most valuable features."
"The Microsoft Windows Autopilot and Defender policies are the most valuable features of this solution."
"The stability of Microsoft Intune is good."
"It provides control over all mobile devices that are being connected to the corporate network."
"I like the tool's integration with Apple. Anyone who creates an ID in Intune will get an Apple ID."
"Autopilot is the most valuable feature."
"Easy to use."
"It is a very helpful solution."
"We can scale the product."
"Everything is easily centralized and managed under this one product."
"The patch management aspect of the solution is the most valuable part for us."
"The stability is great."
"Desktop Central has improved these organizations and this is why it has been repeated multiple times at multiple organizations. If something works and is getting better it is worth repeating."
"Well, what we like is that it catch actually a lot of features constantly upgrading. So all the three maybe there there were some features as the tenant on the earliest version. Now it's it's almost everything that we we need. So managing security ManageEngine configuration. It's we are very satisfied because it has the Telstra that's what we we need."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the Patch Management."
"Its cross-platform capabilities and the ability to do both OS-level patching and third-party patching are valuable. It is difficult to find a software product that will do all that for you out of the box, and you don't have to do any configuration other than your initial setup. Once you do that, there is a very minimalistic approach to getting it operational. You can have it up and running within a 20-minute time span."
"Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management offers on-premises deployment."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the ability to assign a package to a user on a system If you have your software packages set up via SCCM. It automates the process, which is very convenient, especially since most of our people are remote. Additionally, the overall functionality is good."
"Intune has limited integration with non-Microsoft solutions."
"There needs to be more support for Mac operating systems."
"An area for improvement is the absence of seamless integration, particularly with external dashboards."
"There can be delays in the deployment of new policies."
"No option to do end-to-en macOS management. Slow implementation of policies."
"There is still a gap between SCCM and Intune, especially in the reporting, inventory, and software deployment areas."
"When Microsoft Intune is used with different android devices it does not always work as it is supposed to."
"The policies we had in SCCM and AD offered features that are missing from Microsoft Intune."
"Improvement should be done as per customer requirements."
"The Deployment scheduler needs updating to support various methods for deployment."
"We are looking for a complete solution for patch management with central management and the cloud which ManageEngine Endpoint Central does not provide."
"The tool's security can be better."
"The OS deployment could be better."
"I would like to have the option to install the agent remotely."
"The solution lacks some configuration."
"The pricing could be a bit better."
"Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management could improve the user interface, it is not very intuitive."
"In terms of integration, there is still room for improvement in Matrix42."
More ManageEngine Endpoint Central Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
ManageEngine Endpoint Central is ranked 4th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 59 reviews while Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management is ranked 12th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 2 reviews. ManageEngine Endpoint Central is rated 8.2, while Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of ManageEngine Endpoint Central writes "An in-depth and intuitive product with good cross-platform capabilities, but they should have a more global support channel". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management writes "It is a complete and competitive solution with excellent OEM support". ManageEngine Endpoint Central is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus and SOTI MobiControl, whereas Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management is most compared with Ivanti Neurons for MDM.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors and best Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.