We performed a comparison between JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and NetSuite OneWorld based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Flexibility is the most valuable aspect of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne because it allows customization."
"The product can scale."
"Traceability is the most valuable feature of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne...The stability of the solution is excellent."
"I think it is strong in sales, inventory, and pricing."
"The solution is very easy to set up."
"The 1V reporting is straightforward and simple to use. Creating 1V reports does not require any technical knowledge."
"The most valuable feature is the user experience, where you can create your own queries, it sends you alerts, and it's very flexible."
"We find the ease of use, customization, and user interface valuable."
"The solution is user-friendly and flexible."
"Inventory management in NetSuite OneWorld is one of the best in the industry, so this feature is what I like most about the solution."
"NetSuite is a great solution, fast to bring up and makes everyone's life easier."
"The solution has helped us save money by reducing the number of people needed for delivery, finance, and customer service. We now better understand our stock and purchases, and our sales team can access information without constantly communicating with delivery."
"Allows us to use it the way we need to instead of changing our needs and processes to fit the product."
"The executive dashboards have satisfied the founders and leadership with up to the minute information. This allows them to make high level decisions."
"The solution is scalable."
"NetSuite OneWorld, the consolidation feature has been incredibly valuable. However, I cannot speak to the full range of features and functionalities offered by OneWorld as I am not familiar with all of them. I have utilized OneWorld primarily in the biotech industry, with a focus on operating expenses and financial reporting, such as capital contributions and foreign currency adjustments. I am confident, however, that OneWorld offers a robust module for reporting and consolidating revenue, though I have not had the opportunity to directly utilize this aspect of the software."
"I would like to see the HR features enhanced with respect to localization for South Africa and other countries."
"The licensing is expensive compared to other solutions on the market."
"Something that could be included is a supply chain management system. That's what we're looking for."
"Originally, there were some complications with implementation."
"Forms customization should be easier. Currently, it has to go through the development life cycle."
"What would make JD Edwards EnterpriseOne better is more straightforward project implementation, including reducing the costs associated with upgrading projects."
"We found that the system was unable to address many of our concerns, especially when it comes to project management."
"The solution could be easier to implement. However, the complexity was in our internal processes meeting our country's requirements. Every country has a slightly different process, taxation, and rules. That was the difficult part, not the solution itself. I expect our experience would have been more or less the same with any ERP, such as SAP, Navision, or Dynamics."
"Certain analytics features are missing that I've come to expect from other systems. Additionally, there are occasional issues with data accuracy that need to be addressed. Overall, deeper analytics capabilities would greatly improve the tool's usefulness for me."
"Project collaboration through Dashboard Business Management and Relations Management is easy to perform, but it does need to be worked on as it is difficult for customers, suppliers, and internal users to use."
"There is not a 20 year pedigree of pharma experience in the NetSuite channel. While there are many of these CMO Pharma companies rapidly moving to NetSuite, there are few consultants with true pharma experience. Those who have experience are stretched pretty thin."
"I don’t like the SaaS models. Of course, they make the tool powerful enough to run a billion-dollar business. The tool is cheaper than SAP or Core."
"If you were to use standard costs, it doesn't handle standard costs well."
"NetSuite OneWorld, the consolidation feature has been incredibly valuable. However, I cannot speak to the full range of features and functionalities offered by OneWorld as I am not familiar with all of them. I have utilized OneWorld primarily in the biotech industry, with a focus on operating expenses and financial reporting, such as capital contributions and foreign currency adjustments. I am confident, however, that OneWorld offers a robust module for reporting and consolidating revenue, though I have not had the opportunity to directly utilize this aspect of the software."
"The solution could improve by having more integration."
"In NetSuite OneWorld, what needs improvement is the production planning functionality."
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 7th in ERP with 55 reviews while NetSuite OneWorld is ranked 14th in ERP with 14 reviews. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2, while NetSuite OneWorld is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetSuite OneWorld writes "Customizable with great integration capabilities and very good stability". JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, SAP ERP, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and SAP S/4HANA, whereas NetSuite OneWorld is most compared with NetSuite ERP, SAP Business One and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central. See our JD Edwards EnterpriseOne vs. NetSuite OneWorld report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.