We performed a comparison between JIRA Portfolio and Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The documentation is very well done."
"The product's centralized database creates a single source of data for working groups so no data needs to be reconciled."
"I think the solution's most important and valuable feature is its ability to track the issues."
"The valuable features of the JIRA Portfolio are the customization it provides which is very useful and the Agile project management capability."
"The best features of JIRA are its flexibility and configurability, allowing us to tailor it to our specific needs."
"The developers can simplify tasks and each one of them can undertake a task and then they continue with development. Our processes are more efficient and easier for our manager and developers to track them. Their work is more organized."
"The customized workflows we can define are very valuable. JIRA's private projects is very useful as well. There are also a lot of plugins that they provide."
"Managing product development and managing inter-team communications are also valuable features."
"Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is a well-engineered product from an IT perspective."
"I like Primavera's planning capabilities."
"The solution's tech support is good."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is accuracy."
"The ability to streamline the process of obtaining signatures from our contractors is valuable."
"We had to use assistance for the initial setup."
"In the next release, Portfolio should include more metrics and develop their portfolio planning."
"We are using the on-premise deployment, but it is slower and not as easy to manage as the cloud version."
"JIRA and Confluence must be linked automatically."
"JIRA Portfolio could improve new implementation because if I want integration for the complete wide frame tools it cannot provide any wide frame tools."
"It would be really nice if the solution provided a heads-up every time they enhance something or add new features."
"Currently lacks AWS integration."
"With Jira, an issue that arises is the length of time it takes to show certain data."
"The scalability has room for improvement."
"The solution's user interface is an area with shortcomings that need improvement."
"They should work on integrating the solution with ERP."
"Primavera could be better integrated with other products, and it needs more cost management features."
"The reporting could improve project management. We need multiple source reports. If someone is new to the support it has a steep learning curve."
More Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
JIRA Portfolio is ranked 4th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 47 reviews while Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is ranked 11th in Project Portfolio Management with 6 reviews. JIRA Portfolio is rated 8.2, while Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of JIRA Portfolio writes "Powerful, flexible solution with a bit of a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management writes "It helps us track progress and results". JIRA Portfolio is most compared with Jira Align, Microsoft Project Server, Adobe Workfront, Microsoft Azure DevOps and Broadcom Clarity , whereas Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is most compared with Microsoft Project Server, EcoSys, Broadcom Clarity , LoadSpring SpringBoard Cloud Portal and Artemis Enterprise. See our JIRA Portfolio vs. Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management report.
We monitor all Enterprise Agile Planning Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.