We performed a comparison between Joomla and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management."One of the most robust, stable, secure, feature-rich CMSs on the market."
"The speed in which you can take a CMS and make it a full-blown shopping cart with analytics tracking, SEO, user accounts, security, and ease of use through a robust framework of modules and plugins to enhance and promote-related content is about as turnkey as it gets with Joomla."
"The initial setup is easy."
"Information is now available instantly to managers on all devices."
"Tech support tops off as excellent."
"No code and low code, scalable, and stable collaboration platform. Straightforward to set up. Its support system is good and offers fast issue resolution."
"It facilitates collaboration and the ability to create custom workflows."
"The product provides flexibility in collaboration."
"It offers ease of use, which is crucial."
"The ability to have version control and co-editing is vital to our workflows."
"I would like to see more back-end admin power pulled into the front-end, therefore the admins will not have to use the back-end as much, especially for the menu manager, user manager, etc. versus using third-party extensions to achieve this."
"I would like to see the same sorting and attributes available through the web browser on the JED (sorting by free or commercial license, sort by rating, popularity, etc.) within the back-end Joomla Web Installer when browsing extensions."
"It has worked very well for me. It seems like they've improved everything. I don't have any cons about it as such, but I don't think they have a talk-to-text, speech-to-text, or speech-to-type. That would be cool for accessibility."
"SharePoint’s scalability could be improved."
"The initial setup is complex and has room for improvement."
"The management of the product/back-end is complex."
"I understand that some functions are lost when you store the information in a file system, so maybe that's a way SharePoint can improve."
"One issue is that when users mistakenly hide files or set permissions incorrectly, it can lead to files becoming inaccessible, requiring intervention from Microsoft support to resolve."
"Document management and the ability to easily integrate single sign-on (SSO) are areas for improvement in SharePoint."
"The company also needs to make sure that their policies are dictating how information is stored and used, instead of letting SharePoint take control."
Earn 20 points
Joomla is ranked 14th in Web Content Management while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Web Content Management with 146 reviews. Joomla is rated 8.6, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Joomla writes "One of the most robust, stable, secure, feature-rich CMSs on the market". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Joomla is most compared with , whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, Box and WordPress.
See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.