• Home
  • k6 Open Source vs. Tricentis NeoLoad

Tricentis NeoLoad vs k6 Open Source comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
k6 Logo
k6 Open Source
Read 1 k6 Open Source review
252 views|193 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Tricentis Logo
Tricentis NeoLoad
Read 60 Tricentis NeoLoad reviews
8,643 views|4,336 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Load Testing Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between k6 Open Source and Tricentis NeoLoad based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Tricentis, OpenText and others in Load Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Load Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
NalinGoonawardana
Offers good scalability and has the ability to integrate with various systems and services
Anonymous User
Improves the test lifecycle time, but the GUI component isn't stable enough
It's improving our test lifecycle time. It's taking less time compared to the previous tool.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The standout feature of k6 is its strong focus on API performance testing."

More k6 Open Source Pros →

"The most valuable feature is flexibility, as it connects to all of the endpoints that we need it to.""The most valuable feature is the ability to execute parallel requests, unlike JMeter and LoadRunner which can only be run sequentially.""The most useful aspect of Tricentis NeoLoad was for the web.""My company has a good experience with Tricentis NeoLoad, and what I like best about it is that it lets you generate loads from different geographies. The load generation agents getting placed on different geographies is a very good feature of the solution. I also like that you can scale up Tricentis NeoLoad very quickly. The general feedback on performance testing with Tricentis NeoLoad for all product lines within my company is good.""There are several key features, including Jenkins integration, infrastructure monitoring, and results analysis.""It offered us an easy to use, limited code option for end-to-end performance testing.""The test cases are quite easy to build and to maintain. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us. It's the reason why they changed from JMeter to NeoLoad.""Tool for load testing and performance testing with good API support and good technical support. Tricentis NeoLoad is absolutely stable and scalable."

More Tricentis NeoLoad Pros →

Cons
"One area where k6 could improve is by introducing a GUI similar to JMeter."

More k6 Open Source Cons →

"Tricentis NeoLoad could improve the terminal emulation mainframe. It is not able to use the low code or no code option. You have to code it yourself.""Some users may find NeoLoad too technical, while other users may prefer a scripting language instead of a UI with figures and forms they have to fill in.""Regular and strong support has to be made available by Tricentis during the solution's implementation and initial setup.""Tricentis NeoLoad crashes if an application contains more than 1,000 scripts.""Most people focus on HTTPS or TCP, but it would be good to have support for a variety of different protocols.""In future releases, it would be good if extra added features for integration are added into NeoLoad.""An area for improvement in Tricentis NeoLoad is its integration with third-party tools because, at the moment, it's a bit complicated. Per Tricentis, you can integrate Tricentis NeoLoad with different monitoring tools such as Dynatrace and New Relic, but that requires installing an additional tool to make that integration happen, rather than being able to pull in Tricentis NeoLoad from the different tools and servers, and make integration simpler and easier.""LoadRunner offers a full protocol, whereas, with this product, only a few of the protocols are supported - not all."

More Tricentis NeoLoad Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Licence cost is very attractive compared to other vendor tools and also there are many license alternatives."
  • "The pricing is fair for high-volume licensing."
  • "It is cheaper than other solutions."
  • "The licensing cost is less compared to other licensing performance testing tools."
  • "Licensing for NeoLoad is subscription-based."
  • "Its licensing cost is very less."
  • "NeoLoad is cheaper compared to other solutions. There are no additional licensing fees."
  • "Pricing is always cheaper with Tricentis NeoLoad versus the very expensive Micro Focus LoadRunner."

    • More Tricentis NeoLoad Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    LoadRunner vs NeoLoad
    The six phases of an IT project Enthusiasm Disillusionment Panic Search for the guilty Punishment of the innocent (the performance tester) Praise and rewards for the incompetent non-participants This article has been put together as part of an evaluation of the performance test tools NeoLoad and LoadRunner. I consulted a variety of sources, including user groups, discussions with colleagues, telephone chats with HP (the vendors of LoadRunner) and Neotys (the vendors of NeoLoad), and of course the Oracle – Google. The opinions in this article are my own and do not represent the views of any particular company, the software vendors or any organisation (and I’ve assumed that readers have some knowledge of web application performance testing). The versions discussed in this article as of April 2014 are: LoadRunner 11.52 NeoLoad 4.2.2 I hope this evaluation and comparison will assist you with your own evaluation of LoadRunner and NeoLoad. Introduction LoadRunner and NeoLoad are considered the top two best performance testing tools on the market. Comparing the two tools is just like comparing a Mercedes Benz and a BMW: both are high performance, perfectly engineered machines that also have an associated prestige. Performance testing is a critical component of the software testing process. It determines the actual operational boundaries that will simulate the real world use of an application. Performance testing is load testing, stress testing and scalability testing. Why… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about k6 Open Source?
    Top Answer:The standout feature of k6 is its strong focus on API performance testing.
    What needs improvement with k6 Open Source?
    Top Answer:One area where k6 could improve is by introducing a GUI similar to JMeter. While k6 is a powerful tool for performance testing, it leans heavily towards coding. Having a GUI, even if it is a low-code… more »
    What is your primary use case for k6 Open Source?
    Top Answer:k6 Open Source is a powerful tool, especially for API-level performance testing. Its integration capabilities and ease of use make it promising for a wider audience.
    Do you recommend Tricentis NeoLoad?
    Top Answer:I highly recommend Tricentis NeoLoad for companies that are in need of a versatile load and performance testing tool. This relatively inexpensive solution is recognized by organizations like Oxford… more »
    What do you like most about Neotys NeoLoad?
    Top Answer:What I found best in Tricentis NeoLoad is that it's better with scripting and load test execution in the load testing environment compared to its competitors. The tool has a better design, scenarios… more »
    Read all 16 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Neotys NeoLoad?
    Top Answer:I don't have information on the licensing cost of Tricentis NeoLoad because my manager handles that. From a testing perspective and based on company requirements, the current license is for one… more »
    Read all 13 answers   →
    Ranking
    17th
    out of 25 in Load Testing Tools
    Views
    252
    Comparisons
    193
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    500
    Rating
    7.0
    2nd
    out of 25 in Load Testing Tools
    Views
    8,643
    Comparisons
    4,336
    Reviews
    20
    Average Words per Review
    564
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Load Impact
    NeoLoad, Neotys NeoLoad
    Learn More
    k6
    Video Not Available
    Tricentis
    Overview

    Load Impact offers three main features:

    1. Automated testing - Integrates into your CD pipeline with CI plug-ins or opt for full control with API/SDKs.
    2. API testing - a powerful scripting environment where you can create as simple or complex API scenarios as you need.
    3. Web & web app testing - easily load test your website or web app. Record user scenarios using our Chrome extension or proxy recorder and configure a test with just a few clicks - no programming required.

    Tricentis NeoLoad is a performance testing tool that provides developers and testers with automatic test design, test maintenance, realistic simulation of user behavior, fast root cause analysis, and built-in integrations with the entire SDLC toolchain. With NeoLoad’s plugins, teams can reuse and share test assets and results from functional testing tools, analytics, metrics, and APM tools in order to catch performance issues early. With NeoLoad’s full tech stack support, users can test the range of mobile, web, and desktop apps.

    Tricentis NeoLoad Features

    Tricentis NeoLoad has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Supports API technologies 

      • Support for SOAP/REST.
      • Assisted design with Swagger/Open API import and highly efficient extractors for quick test design and fewer errors in scripting.
      • Ability to test as code or GUI-based productivity.

    • Automated testing of API performance

      • CI/CD automated API testing, dynamic load generation infrastructure, and auto pass/fail based on SLAs.
      • Real-time test results for fast dev feedback loop if bottleneck is found.
      • Non-regression API performance trends.
    • API-based applications 

      • Ability to test stand-alone APIs or APIs within end-to-end tests. Same platform, same skills.
      • Dev, PO, QA, Ops share a common view of API performance.
      • Confidence in API and application speed and reliability.

    • Design tests faster and update automatically

      • Assisted design using wizards and automatic parameter handling.
      • Reuse functional scripts and/or convert LoadRunner scripts to NeoLoad performance tests.
      • Update system-level scripts quicker with automatic user path updates.
      • Easy to reuse and maintain.

    • Realistic user simulation

      • Simulate any business case.
      • Scale load tests with up to millions of virtual users.

    • Bottleneck identification

      • Real-time test analysis.
      • Pass/fail based on SLA.
      • Root cause analysis.

    Tricentis NeoLoad Benefits

    There are many benefits to implementing Tricentis NeoLoad. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

    • Automate API testing within CI pipelines: Design, maintain, and run performance tests. Analyze results within continuous integration pipelines.
    • Accelerate end-to-end app testing: Create test scripts fast for complex applications using a graphical user interface without the complexity of scripting new and updated tests.
    • Find performance bottlenecks fast: Compare SLAs to server-level statistics to measure how an application is performing. See overall analysis of behavior or an analysis of the data flow to a particular user path.
    • Manage across the enterprise: Collaborate across QA, operations, dev, and business teams to define SLAs and review results. Share test results and manage test infrastructure. Schedule and share resources across teams and apps.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Tricentis NeoLoad stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Some of these include its price, its user-friendly UX, its API support, and its scalability. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:

    Patrik B., Technical Lead at a tech services company, writes, “The licensing cost is very less for NeoLoad. It is user-friendly and easy to understand because they have created so many useful functionalities. When I started working with this tool, we just had to do the initial assessment about whether this tool will be able to support our daily work or not. I could easily understand it.”

    A Global Delivery Head at a consultancy firm notes, “The API support is much better with this solution, compared with the competition. Pricing for it is also more affordable than its competitor. We have used Tricentis NeoLoad and we find it scalable.”

    Sample Customers
    rackspace, salesforce.com, IBM, servicenow, Nasdaq, JWT
    Dell, H&R Block, Best Buy, Orange, Verizon Wireless, ING, Mazda, Siemens, University of Oxford
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Retailer14%
    Government11%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization44%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business7%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise75%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise49%
    Large Enterprise41%
    Buyer's Guide
    Load Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, Tricentis, OpenText and others in Load Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    k6 Open Source is ranked 17th in Load Testing Tools with 1 review while Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 2nd in Load Testing Tools with 60 reviews. k6 Open Source is rated 7.0, while Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of k6 Open Source writes "Offers good scalability and has the ability to integrate with various systems and services". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes "Offers good user interface, customization and I like how it way it correlates, monitors, and integrates with the user interface". k6 Open Source is most compared with Apache JMeter, RadView WebLOAD and Akamai CloudTest, whereas Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Apache JMeter, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, Tricentis Tosca and Oracle Application Testing Suite.

    See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.