"If we make a change to a job and I want to pull a drive off of a set of computers, I can do it without having to leave my desk. Before we started using the solution, I would have had to go to every machine. That was a much more cumbersome way of handling it."
"The most valuable in Desktop Central is the way it is tightly coupled with the rest of the modules and the entire gamut of ManageEngine."
"ManageEngine Desktop Central has greatly improved our organization by utilizing Service Desk Plus to monitor and keep track of issues that our end users report to our Help Desk Department. We also have written in the ode of our company's software to notify Support if an end-user experience an issue and does not report it."
"The most valuable feature of ManageEngine Endpoint Central is the central management console. Additionally, inventory tracking is helpful for knowing where our assets are."
"The product works perfectly for patch management and software deployments."
"ManageEngine Desktop Central automatically alerts you if there are newer releases or updates. You do not have to go to their website and check."
"The patch manager is good, and it's easy to use."
"Page management and ADA integrations are the most valuable features of ManageEngine Endpoint Central."
"The solution's most valuable features are its patch management capabilities, especially for third-party applications, along with quick and easy configuration and deployment processes."
"It would be nice if it were a little easier to maneuver around the patch management. I would like to use that more, but it got very cumbersome and complicated when I tried to use it in the past. I haven't used that much since then."
"Its licensing should be improved."
"The pricing is lower than other well-respected solutions in this category."
"The Deployment scheduler needs updating to support various methods for deployment."
"Desktop Central has very good information, however, you can't customize the dashboards."
"The reports provided by the product are an area of concern where improvements are required. The visibility provided by the reports is not very attractive."
"Each of their products is an independent product, and they don't have anything to do with each other. It is a suite of packages. They all run independently, and they all are a little different because they were acquired differently. They could standardize their portfolio."
"We would like to see options for deploying Microsoft 365 accounts into Outlook. For now we only can use it to deploy exchange accounts. Also we would like to see an option do decline Windows 7 ESU patches in a bulk."
"Improvement should be done as per customer requirements."
More ManageEngine Endpoint Central Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
KACE Desktop Authority is ranked 4th in Client Desktop Management while ManageEngine Endpoint Central is ranked 1st in Client Desktop Management with 60 reviews. KACE Desktop Authority is rated 10.0, while ManageEngine Endpoint Central is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of KACE Desktop Authority writes "Saves me time and effort when adding and subtracting drives, and Premier Support handles updates". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine Endpoint Central writes "An in-depth and intuitive product with good cross-platform capabilities, but they should have a more global support channel". KACE Desktop Authority is most compared with , whereas ManageEngine Endpoint Central is most compared with Microsoft Intune, Microsoft Configuration Manager, VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf Pro and ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus.
See our list of best Client Desktop Management vendors.
We monitor all Client Desktop Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
