We performed a comparison between Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and Quest KACE Systems Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Compliance solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool's interface is good."
"The price per endpoint is excellent."
"We swtiched to Kaspersky Endpoint Security because we found our previous solution did not meet our requirements."
"I think that all the features are valuable for our environment."
"It's flexible, and Kaspersky Endpoint Security's performance is good. Also, the pricing is fine."
"It's easy to use."
"Endpoint Security is efficient and easy to use. It doesn't slow the performance of your personal computer."
"One of the most valuable features is that it's quite secure. I'm satisfied with this solution."
"KACE’s knowledge-based articles are very good."
"I like how when you click on the device, it shows you everything that has changed as well as the software versioning. I am really enjoying the inventory aspect of it."
"My company had bought some new machines. We used the tool to do some basic settings to ship every machine the same way and undertake the Windows deployment. We did the scripted installation. The tool helped us deploy custom software for specific departments. We also did Windows updates with the product."
"The information available via KACE is up to date, critical to our normal operations, and has become the go-to tool of our IT teams for extended support."
"This solution makes it easy to control assets and upgrade all types of software."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to monitor updates—the software versions—on machines so that we can keep everything compliant."
"There is ease of use, and its pricing was a driving factor."
"The solution provides us a single pane of glass with everything that we need for endpoint management of all devices. It definitely has made our endpoint management process much easier."
"We would like it so that if a user uses it on-premises, the server should use fewer hardware resources."
"We've found that sometimes the solution is not doing its job in detecting some malware."
"We have zero-day detection of malware but it cannot detect other types of unknown intrusions."
"I rate the pricing five out of ten."
"The support must provide quick responses."
"The performance level could be better."
"The company needs to keep developing more security measures to help keep its customers safe. If they could keep adding to security features, it would be ideal."
"The solution could use better reporting."
"I have complaints about smart label adaptation and because of this, I recommend a 24 to 48 hour bake-in period."
"Paying for the product should come with full and extended training anytime it is needed."
"Easier integration would be beneficial."
"When we have to do a rebuild on these machines, although it is rare, I would like to be able to do more than 10 at a time. With the current limit, it slows me down because I have to set up 10, then the next 10, and so forth."
"There isn't a lot they need to improve with the solution itself at this point. It is pretty close to providing a single pane of glass for everything that we need for endpoint management specifically on all devices. There is very little that it doesn't provide for us, and for those, we have to go to other methods. There are some of the patching solutions that it doesn't take care of for us. So, we have to do those manually on the devices, and that's really the biggest thing. It doesn't do patching really well for non-Microsoft applications. The major application updates, particularly Windows updates, don't function nearly as well, but, for the vast majority of things, it does just fine. If they could improve in this aspect, that'd be great, but I don't know if they're going to be able to do that."
"I think it should have the ability to have the applications automatically update. It would be really helpful if this would override what the user might choose to do."
"We had issues with the tool's support. We are a Dutch firm and everything has to be in Dutch. We were not able to do the alerts. You were required to tweak them a lot to get them in the language that you preferred. The solution's support depended on the person that you got online. Sometimes, the response was fast and other times you needed to wait a long time. The support also depended on the levels of support that you had requested."
"My biggest complaint is that almost every time they send out a new version, it fixes something and breaks another. Something that wasn't working in the last version now works, but something else stops; or they'll remove some dashboard that I really found to be nice and replace it with something totally different that I could care less about."
More Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Quest KACE Systems Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is ranked 2nd in Endpoint Compliance with 111 reviews while Quest KACE Systems Management is ranked 5th in Endpoint Compliance with 38 reviews. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is rated 8.0, while Quest KACE Systems Management is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business writes "Easy to setup, stable and good security use cases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quest KACE Systems Management writes "Easy to use, saves us time, and increases IT productivity". Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Fortinet FortiClient, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform and Check Point Harmony Endpoint, whereas Quest KACE Systems Management is most compared with Microsoft Intune, Microsoft Configuration Manager, Microsoft Windows Server Update Services, BigFix and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. See our Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs. Quest KACE Systems Management report.
See our list of best Endpoint Compliance vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Compliance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.