We performed a comparison between Katalon Studio and Worksoft Certify based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Whenever I speak to the support team of Katalon Studio, I learn that some new features will be included in the product. It is a scalable product."
"This solution is very user-friendly to learn and implement, and less technical knowledge is required to handle automation."
"Our clients have requested by all types of testing, including mobile, desktop, and API testing and all of those are covered by Katalon. I find that very valuable, very complete."
"I personally like the 'Object Spy' feature of this tool. It makes it easy to find an element on the web page."
"The functionality of the data is very good. You can upload and disperse data using the solution."
"It has been good so far for API testing on Mac. It is not that hard to learn and use. There is so much support out there, so if anyone wants to start using it, there is enough help."
"The best feature is the split up between test cases and the test object. This allows us to easily change an error."
"It supports multiple easy-to-learn languages."
"We prefer Worksoft over other platforms because it's a low-code solution"
"Improvement means for us that we have to be better in quality. Due to automation, you can run every automated test case twice a week. If you do it manually, you do it once per release. This is a quality improvement."
"The Capture 2.0 feature is very intuitive, useful, and user-friendly. You can do so much with it now, versus the older version."
"Certify integrates with other tools and it works very well with other machine testing applications."
"The most valuable feature is having a no-code solution for automation, so our QA team and some of our business users can work on automation. Then, they don't have to be developers."
"The easy of use and ease of integration of Worksoft Certify are very good."
"It is a lot easier to maintain test scripts on Worksoft Certify than on other testing tools that we have had in the past."
"It is a pretty easy tool to use as far as automated testing tools go."
"Now we are having difficulties in using it and had to limit our automation experts to the features that Katalon allows us to use for free. It was free access and they claimed that it would be free for all time."
"My recently-updated Katalon studio version hangs a lot and is not a stable version."
"What it lacks is the Selenium Grid capabilities."
"We have been seeing some error pop-ups that are difficult to understand why they were triggered."
"It would be helpful to have an automatic save feature."
"Support options need improvement. It is sometimes hard to find a solution to any given problem, thus you are forced to use another solution."
"There could potentially be more reporting within the solution. We need more issue reports, for example."
"The price of the solution is a bit high. It's one of the reasons we decided not to continue using the product."
"Performance on the web UI part, especially with some of the more comprehensive Fiori features, like the complex tables that are being used, could be improved. In those cases we have noticed a lot of execution-time increase with regards to the Certify solution."
"I am aware that they have some challenges with some of their support resources, especially offshore which is very common. I don't think this is specifically a Worksoft issue. It always seems to be a software issue, and I know that Worksoft is aware of this and they are trying to make some improvements."
"There are some other more complete tools than Worksoft Certify, such as Tricentis Tosca. It has a quicker way of taking in a customer's feedback with more efficiency. I do not see Worksoft Certify having a lot of progress over the years that we have used the tool in this area."
"It is poor for a web based application."
"Reportings are not user-friendly."
"The stability needs help. This is main thing that needs help, and if it's not the stability, then it's Worksoft's ability to respond to issues."
"For Execution Manager, I would like it to be more robust interface and be able to view the remote machines full screen instead of a little window."
"The overall speed and performance of this solution could be improved. In a future release, it would be useful to be able to do API testing."
Katalon Studio is ranked 5th in API Testing Tools with 41 reviews while Worksoft Certify is ranked 6th in API Testing Tools with 64 reviews. Katalon Studio is rated 7.8, while Worksoft Certify is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Katalon Studio writes "Useful multiple technology platform, scalable, but usability could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Worksoft Certify writes "Enables us to automate end-to-end testing of our integration between S/4HANA and Salesforce.com". Katalon Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Postman, OpenText UFT One, Appium and Testim, whereas Worksoft Certify is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ, OpenText UFT One, Panaya Test Dynamix and IBM Rational Functional Tester. See our Katalon Studio vs. Worksoft Certify report.
See our list of best API Testing Tools vendors, best Test Automation Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all API Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
