We performed a comparison between KVM and Odin Virtuozzo Containers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Proxmox, VMware, Microsoft and others in Server Virtualization Software."Very cost-effective."
"It is an easily scalable solution."
"If you prefer command-line, there are all kinds of command-line options."
"One of the best features of KVM is its user-friendly interface."
"It offers a high-availability environment."
"This solution is open source and easy to configure."
"The performance is great."
"The most valuable feature of KVM is its stability."
"When you run templates on the containers on Virtuozzo they have a lot of back-ups."
"I believe KVM offers a unified answer, while ProxMark addresses orchestration. KVM lacks orchestration. If the aim is to centrally oversee multiple KVMs – let's say to freeze them – a centralized management solution is absent."
"Monitoring and resolution could be improved."
"The KVM tech support is really bad. They are not very responsive."
"The solution’s user interface could be improved and made more user-friendly."
"We still occasionally build Interlaced Wireless Protection within our environment. The ecosystem entails areas, where we support agents, and release backup and security solutions. Collaboration with independent software vendors (ITOLs or ITOLED) is necessary to offer these solutions to customers. However, the scope of the ecosystem in KVM is not as extensive as that of VMware's. In contrast, VMware boasts a robust partner network, allowing for comprehensive customer solutions. On the other hand, KVM’s ecosystem is comparatively limited in comparison. I would like to see FT features in KVM."
"The main drawback in the solution is probably disaster recovery."
"Its resource usage can be improved."
"Technical support is not top-notch."
"Odin Virtuozzo has poor support and needs to improve."
KVM is ranked 4th in Server Virtualization Software with 39 reviews while Odin Virtuozzo Containers is ranked 11th in Server Virtualization Software with 2 reviews. KVM is rated 8.0, while Odin Virtuozzo Containers is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of KVM writes "Delivers good performance because of kernel-based virtualization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Odin Virtuozzo Containers writes "Significant backup for containers, but the customer service is terrible". KVM is most compared with Proxmox VE, Oracle VM VirtualBox, Hyper-V, VMware vSphere and OpenVZ, whereas Odin Virtuozzo Containers is most compared with Proxmox VE, Nutanix AHV Virtualization, Hyper-V and VMware vSphere.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.