We performed a comparison between Odin Virtuozzo Containers and VMware vSphere based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Proxmox, VMware, Microsoft and others in Server Virtualization Software."When you run templates on the containers on Virtuozzo they have a lot of back-ups."
"One of the most valuable features that vSphere has is its HA and DRS protection, where it can simply make sure that all the machines are always where they need to be and how they need to be taken care of. We have a lot of servers and services for emergency services for police, fire, and the like. We have the ability to use DRS as Anti-Affinity Rules to make sure that those redundant server pairs always stay away from each other. But then, if anything would happen to one of them, we have HA to be able to come up and bring it right up and going again."
"The most important feature is the ability to balance the servers with Distributed Resource Scheduler (DRS). It is a very useful feature and should be mandatory for vSphere to have but it is only available in the enterprise edition. It should be available in all versions."
"The most valuable feature is vSAN, as it reduces the cost of SAN storage and maintenance."
"I like the standard features."
"Also, the automated builds are being done through it, and we don't have to manually do it anymore. All of my AIS platforms are completely automated now with the VM suite."
"The solution's flexibility allows us to implement it widely."
"VMware vSphere has a lot of features that are valuable, such as multiple clusters, VM mobility, VDI, and virtual desktop."
"The tool comes with scale-out capabilities. Deploying new infrastructure became much quicker, saving significant time previously spent sourcing hardware for each installation. It also has the ability to downscale on rack spaces, reducing the number of rack units needed to accommodate our servers."
"Odin Virtuozzo has poor support and needs to improve."
"The HTML 5 client has always lagged behind."
"The user interface could use some improvement."
"It would be great if the free version included a management tool that was a scaled-down vCenter Manager."
"The one area where I would love to see an improvement is the HTML5 client. It's great, but it could get better."
"It would be highly beneficial for VMware to collaborate with local hosts and partners in countries like those in Africa to establish specific pricing that would align with the economic conditions of countries in Africa, ensuring suitability and compatibility with our consumption capabilities."
"There should be more stability in the updates. They had an issue with the last release."
"I would like to see more software as a service solutions."
"It needs to integrate better between multiple modules."
Odin Virtuozzo Containers is ranked 12th in Server Virtualization Software with 2 reviews while VMware vSphere is ranked 2nd in Server Virtualization Software with 446 reviews. Odin Virtuozzo Containers is rated 6.0, while VMware vSphere is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Odin Virtuozzo Containers writes "Significant backup for containers, but the customer service is terrible". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware vSphere writes "Offers good performance and is useful for banking systems". Odin Virtuozzo Containers is most compared with Proxmox VE, Nutanix AHV Virtualization, Hyper-V and KVM, whereas VMware vSphere is most compared with Hyper-V, Proxmox VE, Oracle VM, VMware Workstation and KVM.
See our list of best Server Virtualization Software vendors.
We monitor all Server Virtualization Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.