We performed a comparison between Loadbalancer.org and Radware Alteon based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."For now, it's stable."
"The SSL Layer 7 load balancing is valuable."
"The load balancers have an easy installation and a relatively simple, easy user interface to use."
"Existing customers are trying to migrate from the physical F5 load balancer to the AVI load balancer because it is scalable and easily managed."
"It's pretty much a Swiss Army knife for managing all the load balancing techniques."
"Loadbalancer is easy to use. It performs well, with low latency."
"With basic network knowledge, our required system functionality can be configured and maintained."
"Most important for us that it makes sure that the load is distributed and that we always have access to the end servers."
"his solution allows me to secure applications, by blocking suspicious traffic based on the signature that has been enabled for that particular application."
"The strength of this solution is the application delivery controller."
"I like the web GUI. It's very intuitive and easy to use."
"A user-friendly and reasonably priced solution."
"Security is one of the most valuable features that I like. It is easy to use and easy to configure."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its stability. During the time that I have been using it, it has not undergone a service failure... And with the integrated application protection, we have not suffered from attacks anymore."
"The most valuable feature is the load-balancing reverse proxy."
"I like the ADC feature and the global certificate feature."
"Possibly a more graphical overview page (with colors) to give a two second overview to see if everything is working fine."
"If I have to say something, I suppose they could add an automated configuration backup to an FTP location (or something similar) so you don’t have to manually do it. I don’t see this as a problem, of course, as the configuration rarely changes and we only need one backup, but maybe for other users that feature would be handy."
"The automatic refresh of the System Overview webpage: It sometimes has an extra webpage reload (after a change) before you see it is executed. This can be confusing."
"Compared to the physical products, the solution's throughput is a little less."
"There are many features you can set in the backend of Loadbalancer. They should simplify the configuration. The administrator should be able to configure it more simply. How it is now, you can only configure it if you have a lot of experience."
"It doesn't have the bonding capability feature."
"The solution can be a bit pricey."
"The configuration is somewhat complicated. Someone who does not know the solution may find this challenging."
"I would like the solution to display and help visualize the reference map more easily. I would also like to better understand where queries come from and know which users are consulting the application, along with which app."
"A feature that I would like to see included in the next version might be a better analysis when working with crypt issues. Right now, it is very manual; you load it into Alteon and it runs. It would be interesting to see a more dynamic process."
"Performance could be improved."
"We are having a difficult time with the security module, and how to implement the Radware security."
"Scalability should be based on customer requirements."
"The service could be improved by better customer support."
"The GUI needs to be improved. Right now, the solution isn't so user-friendly."
"I would like to see future enhancements in security, specifically in threat protection."
Loadbalancer.org is ranked 10th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 22 reviews while Radware Alteon is ranked 7th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 33 reviews. Loadbalancer.org is rated 8.8, while Radware Alteon is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Loadbalancer.org writes "Great WAF - low-maintenance solution that performs as advertised ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware Alteon writes "It's a good fit for a small team because the maintenance is easier and you don't need to know how to code". Loadbalancer.org is most compared with Citrix NetScaler, HAProxy, Fortinet FortiADC and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), whereas Radware Alteon is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Citrix NetScaler, F5 Advanced WAF, A10 Networks Thunder ADC and HAProxy. See our Loadbalancer.org vs. Radware Alteon report.
See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
