We performed a comparison between Malwarebytes and Trellix Endpoint Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"Additionally, when it comes to EDR, there are more tools available to assist with client work."
"This is stable and scalable."
"The central management of devices from different sites is a very good feature; this has made them much easier to manage."
"I was very satisfied with Malwarebytes in terms of its antivirus abilities."
"The installation process is very easy, especially since it is on the cloud."
"The product keeps our company safe."
"The most valuable features of the solution are malware scanning and malware removal."
"The solution has a good management interface."
"It's very versatile and thorough."
"It gets the job done, and they are consistently updating it monthly."
"The solution is reliable."
"It has improved my organization because it helps with visibility, in terms of security. We can see the actual attack and can contain it. The antivirus can detect that."
"It's easy to use and it's very powerful. It offers nice endpoint protection."
"Trellix Endpoint Security's dashboard is very flexible, and I can create my own user-specific dashboard depending on user privilege or preference."
"The thing that I like is that they have gathered almost all the products in one management server, the ePolicy Orchestrator."
"This product has the capability to check a wide range of vulnerabilities and devices."
"The product helps us by contacting us if there are any virus attacks on our system."
"Would benefit with the addition of DLP features."
"Detections could be improved."
"FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"The amount of usage, the number of details we get, or the number of options that can be tweaked is limited in comparison to that with other EDR solutions"
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"The product's stability needs improvement."
"The interface could be improved. Currently, you need to really dig around to find the elements you need."
"We experience a lot of false positives."
"Overall, I haven't found any ways the solution lacks in features or usability."
"They should make it faster, less taxing on the processor."
"Every once in a while, it gets clobbered by updates from other places. I don't think this should happen."
"If they want to compete with bigger players, they should consider adding items like threat detection and website warnings."
"Requires increased efficiency in terms of detecting false positives."
"We’re facing remote installation issues sometimes:"
"McAfee GW Security and McAfee Child Safety need some improvement as they are relatively new."
"The solution's documentation is not streamlined and is in bits and pieces, which should be in a single format."
"We don't like the solution since it requires much memory consumption and consumes much CPU resources."
"Every time we open a ticket with McAfee, their response differs and they are not consistent."
"Trying to move away from the signature model for antivirus and malware blocking is something that would be nice. Instead of having to update every day, which is signature-based, moving to more of a kernel or architecture-based model would probably be beneficial."
"Sometimes, while installing the ePO, we were getting so many errors and I don't know why it happened."
"The product could do more to keep administration alerted to detected threats on endpoints."
Malwarebytes is ranked 18th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 34 reviews while Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 10th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 94 reviews. Malwarebytes is rated 8.0, while Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Malwarebytes writes "Intuitive, easy to use, and does a good job of catching and stopping things for the most part and has a unique rollback feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services". Malwarebytes is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, HP Wolf Security, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Check Point Harmony Endpoint, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and CylancePROTECT. See our Malwarebytes vs. Trellix Endpoint Security report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.