McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs Symantec Data Loss Prevention comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Aug 10, 2023

We compared McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention and Symantec Data Loss Prevention across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:

  • Ease of Deployment: McAfee Total Protection's initial setup can be either simple or challenging, with differing opinions. Users mentioned the importance of expertise and support, as well as potential difficulties with bandwidth and configuration. Symantec Data Loss Prevention's setup varies in complexity, with some users finding it more difficult than other options. 
  • Room for Improvement: McAfee Total Protection could enhance its AI capabilities, improve integration with other vendors, address IoT vulnerabilities, and incorporate GDPR regulations. Symantec Data Loss Prevention could simplify functions, bundle data protection with classification, and improve system resource management.
  • Pricing: McAfee Total Protection's pricing is considered high. Similarly, Symantec Data Loss Prevention also has a costly pricing system, requiring customers to pay a yearly licensing fee.
  • ROI: McAfee Total Protection has been highly rated for its ROI. Symantec Data Loss Prevention is praised for its effective data breach capture and collaboration features, along with providing cost savings.
  • Service and Support: McAfee Total Protection's customer service is considered satisfactory by some users, although they recommend the addition of 24/7 support. Symantec Data Loss Prevention receives mixed feedback regarding its support, as some users appreciate it while others encounter delays and slow response times.

Comparison Results: McAfee's setup process can vary in complexity, whereas Symantec offers more flexibility. McAfee provides a wide range of policies and user control, while Symantec excels in capturing and blocking data breaches. McAfee is generally considered expensive in terms of pricing, while Symantec's pricing is seen as high but fair. McAfee's customer support could be improved, while Symantec's support receives mixed feedback. McAfee prioritizes user-friendliness and data loss prevention, while Symantec focuses on effective breach capture and cost savings.

769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is the ability to control access to USB drives and other external devices.""The administrative capabilities and the interface make this product accessible and easy to use.""The whitelisting works well.""The stability of the solution can be good. However, the configuration takes a long time for it to be done properly.""The most valuable features of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention are the DLP. The DLP, data loss prevention is the most important feature right now that users are looking for.""The pricing of the product is excellent. It's very affordable.""The solution is stable.""The solution is very user-friendly and valuable."

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Pros →

"For detection, it has a great algorithm. It can recognize ID numbers and everything that you put in a policy for the end-users. That is really great for us as an institution where we have sensitive data. It recognizes all the sensitive data when someone tries to transfer it or put in other data.""The accuracy in terms of the rate of detection is good.""The most valuable aspect of Symantec DLP is its broad coverage. Symantec DLP covers USB, Outlook email clients, and web traffic. If we install the endpoint DLP, we can cover multiple channels, including the clipboard and printer.""The synchronize application detection policies have been very good.""Symantec DLP has many servers, and the solution is very powerful because you can use it in ports, endpoints, networks, and email servers to prevent the leakage of emails. DLP can be integrated with Symantec encryption.""DLP's most valuable feature is compliance.""I have found the most valuable feature to be partial enlisting.""I'm able to track everyone who is trying to send information outside the environment and to know if they are not supposed to be sending it. I'm also able to see the people who are accessing or maybe try to access the information they are not supposed to be accessing based on their level of classification. It gives me overall control of who has got access to what and at what point. And who can do what with specific information."

More Symantec Data Loss Prevention Pros →

Cons
"The solution needs an easier integration in heterogeneous and dynamic environments.""We faced many issues with the solution's customer support, and it should be made customer-friendly and more responsive.""McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention could improve by having artificial intelligence.""The interface can be improved, it's too cluttered.""The pricing is high for licensing and support and the GUI interface is good but could use updating.""Integration with other vendors could be improved. For example, with Chrome or Firefox.""Our client is not very happy with the lack of support, the skills, and the effectiveness of the tool.""McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention needs to improve the resources it uses for CPU and RAM."

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Cons →

"The database is a problem for us, as it's running on Oracle and not everybody likes that.""Different departments should manage administration, reporting, normalization and incident management.""Symantec could be better with infrastructure.""Symantec DLP doesn't provide complete cloud coverage. We need another DLP solution to monitor our cloud applications.""DLP could be improved by implementing a cloud-based console.""The upgrade process is convoluted. The server and database software must run in line with third-party providers like the Oracle database. If an Oracle database reaches the end of its life, then servers must be decommissioned, and you need to bring new servers online. When the maintenance packages are deployed to the management server, they don't get pushed to the detection servers. Each detection server must be manually installed rather than automatically made from a single server. If it's a large enterprise, you need to manually install it or use a GPO or some other technology, which I never use.""Their support program needs a lot of improvement. If you are stuck somewhere, getting their support can be difficult.""What could be improved in Symantec Data Loss Prevention is its security. It should be more secure."

More Symantec Data Loss Prevention Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing seems expensive both for the license and the support."
  • "The price is high for this type of product."
  • "If the client purchases the entire suite of McAfee Endpoint, the license is included."
  • "Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
  • "There is an annual license to use this solution."
  • "It's not a cheap option."
  • "I'm paying the license for McAfee Total Protection yearly. It could be cheaper, but it's fine."
  • "The price of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive. It is not the most expensive solution but it is typically 15 to 20 percent higher than other solutions. There is no additional cost to using McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention."
  • More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "If you are a small firm with less than 150 users, Symantec can be too pricey."
  • "From what I know the pricing is good, it's not too expensive. If you negotiate you can get a good price."
  • "The pricing and licensing are based on per user endpoints."
  • "The pricing is competitive and not pricey. We also receive corporate discounts."
  • "We are happy with the pricing and licencing."
  • "In terms of pricing, Symantec DLP works with Oracle Database. Oracle Database licensing is much more expensive than other databases. That might be a drawback for customers. The pricing is on a yearly subscription basis."
  • "Pricing is reasonable."
  • "The pricing is reasonable."
  • More Symantec Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The tool focuses on endpoints rather than networks. Endpoints cover everything. It wouldn't be possible to steal confidential information from endpoints.
    Top Answer:McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive.
    Top Answer:The incident response capability has been instrumental in mitigating potential data loss.
    Top Answer:The product's pricing and support services need improvement.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,099
    Comparisons
    663
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    341
    Rating
    7.9
    Views
    5,587
    Comparisons
    3,562
    Reviews
    23
    Average Words per Review
    567
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    McAfee Total Protection for Data, McAfee Total Protection for DLP, Total Protection for Data, Intel Security Total Protection for Data
    Symantec DLP
    Learn More
    Overview
    McAfee Total Protection for Data solution suite protects your data using a combination of powerful encryption, access control, and user-behavior monitoring.

    Keeping sensitive corporate information safe and compliant has never been easy. But today, you’re faced with a totally new set of data protection challenges. Sensitive information is leaving the safety of your corporate network as more employees share files over consumer cloud storage services and access those files on their own mobile devices. The number of targeted cyber attacks continues to grow, as cybercriminals develop effective new methods for defeating traditional security measures and stealing corporate information. And as all of these factors converge, it becomes increasingly difficult to manage corporate information and protect it against loss and theft. 

    Symantec Data Loss Prevention (DLP) provides a comprehensive approach to information protection that embraces today’s cloud- and mobile-centered realities. With DLP, you can:

    • Discover where data is stored across all of your cloud, mobile, network, endpoint, and storage systems

    • Monitor how data is being used, whether your employees are on or off the network

    • Protect data from being leaked or stolen—no matter where it’s stored or how it’s used

    Sample Customers
    Kleberg Bank
    Hadassah University Hospital, Her Majestys Government (HMG), United Kingdom, Hitachi Consulting Software Services India Pvt Ltd., Hua Nan Bank, Hyundai Department Store Group,JW Marriott Hotel Seoul, Lake Health, McCann Erickson Israel, Molina Healthcare Inc., PGi, Quilvest Switzerland Limited, State of Nevada Public Employees Benefits Program, Symantec Corporation (Enterprise Security), The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust (DLP), The Saudi Industrial Property Authority, TSO cloud, Visa, Yunnan Power Grid Company
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Security Firm13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Insurance Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Comms Service Provider5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business61%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise66%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is ranked 9th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 29 reviews while Symantec Data Loss Prevention is ranked 3rd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 53 reviews. McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is rated 7.4, while Symantec Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention writes "Highly beneficial DLP functionality, full system protection, and useful file scanning". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Data Loss Prevention writes "Consitent, accurate, and simple". McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is most compared with HP Wolf Security, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention and Cisco Secure Endpoint, whereas Symantec Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, Zscaler DLP and CoSoSys Endpoint Protector. See our McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention report.

    See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

    We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.