We performed a comparison between Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation and Perimeter 81 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, Forcepoint and others in Internet Security."Menlo Security RBI's best feature is its threat isolation engine."
"Perimeter 81 is very pretty."
"Providing access and security allows our company employees to work from home and remotely."
"Distributing the agent was very simple, allowing us to enforce security posture on our devices (i.e. S1, Disk-encryption, etc.)."
"The solution provides us with an easy way to configure and join the VPN with Perimeter 81."
"SD-WAN is one of the primary solutions offered by Perimeter 81."
"It connects quickly and stays connected. The user interface is pretty neat too. The app has in-house support with user guides that give you step-by-step walkthroughs on navigating the app. In addition, there is a live chat feature that offers prompt assistance on the go."
"Perimeter 81 provides a very secure and non-disruptive experience."
"The benefits are really built into the underlying protocol, however, Perimeter81 makes these available in a user-friendly way."
"Menlo Security RBI could be more cloud-friendly, and its mobility could be improved."
"One of the more negative experiences using Perimeter 81 is the fact that I am logged off after a pre-determined amount of time which cuts off access to some of my company's resources."
"A Google Chrome extension would be handy instead of logging into the app."
"In order to have to bypass the login using the website, a good feature for Perimeter 81 to have is a login instance in the Perimeter 81 application. I'm using a Mac and we don't have that functionality."
"One of our challenges is ensuring the security of our cloud-based operations."
"The platform still lacks relevant dashboards and the ability to customize them based on our needs."
"Currently, I am not able to define a different country or location, which can result in negative experiences as the tool is being recognized by websites and this can make it difficult to access them or force me to disable the program temporarily."
"I would suggest adding more networking and security features that allow more customization within their platform."
"The solution's speed of upload and download is an area where it lacks"
More Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation Pricing and Cost Advice →
Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation is ranked 7th in Internet Security with 1 review while Perimeter 81 is ranked 5th in ZTNA as a Service with 22 reviews. Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation is rated 8.0, while Perimeter 81 is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation writes "Stable and scalable solution with a great threat isolation engine". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Perimeter 81 writes "Great SAML and SCIM support with the ability to deploy site-2-site tunnels with specific IP restrictions". Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Cisco Umbrella, Cloudflare Access, Skyhigh Security and Akamai Enterprise Application Access, whereas Perimeter 81 is most compared with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Cato SASE Cloud Platform, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Cloudflare Access and Appgate SDP.
We monitor all Internet Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.