We performed a comparison between Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation and Zscaler Internet Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, TitanHQ and others in Internet Security."Menlo Security RBI's best feature is its threat isolation engine."
"Zscaler covers all the features needed to replace a VPN or proxy solution. They are good. They've been on the market for 15 years now, so they are mature enough."
"Overall, we're very happy with our product."
"Whether you are in a hotel somewhere, or in Africa, it does not matter. You will get the Zscaler protection presence anywhere."
"I like the granularity of the control of all the traffic, including SSL inspection. I also like the fact that the user interface is intuitive. The latencies with Zscaler are minimal compared to those of any other competitor. Other competitors do not really have the global scale that Zscaler has and cannot promise low latencies."
"The URL filtering has been the most valuable feature."
"The cloud proxy and integration are some of the key features. Since there is cloud waste, we can quickly provision it and start working on the configuration. On top of that, they have added a few more features. They have integrated CASB, and file sandboxing is part of it."
"After a proper implementation, the maintenance is very low."
"Zscaler Internet Access's best feature is the granular policy controls."
"Menlo Security RBI could be more cloud-friendly, and its mobility could be improved."
"When you have appliances, SSL inspection is always a headache due to poor performance and/or lack of ciphers implemented. "
"If they can also integrate with the multi-factor authentication to prompt users to do another, second-factor authentication, that would be ideal."
"They block Zscaler IPs when the traffic origin is from Zscaler IPs. They've been blocked by certain government organizations so the end users are not able to visit those websites unless we ask them to unblock those IP. This is a bit problematic."
"They could provide more time for the onboarding the training of an IT person."
"I would like to see the ability to choose a pool of IPs for my company, set up rules based on them, and know that those IPs are not used by other companies."
"Sometimes, support isn't available."
"In terms of usage, here in the GCC, it's still growing a growing market, so the combination of DLP, data leak prevention, to a certain extent is fine. But what it requires is user-based access or role-based access. The solution needs to grow into that, which definitely takes time. There's not an easy way to integrate it, when you have a cloud-based solution."
"Zscaler Internet Access's troubleshooting is very limited, and their textbook logs need to be more informative."
More Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation Pricing and Cost Advice →
Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation is ranked 8th in Internet Security with 1 review while Zscaler Internet Access is ranked 2nd in Internet Security with 46 reviews. Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation is rated 8.0, while Zscaler Internet Access is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation writes "Stable and scalable solution with a great threat isolation engine". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zscaler Internet Access writes "Provides integrated CASB and file sandboxing but could be less expensive ". Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation is most compared with Cisco Umbrella, Cloudflare Access, Perimeter 81, Skyhigh Security and Akamai Enterprise Application Access, whereas Zscaler Internet Access is most compared with Cisco Umbrella, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Netskope , Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and Palo Alto Networks WildFire.
See our list of best Internet Security vendors.
We monitor all Internet Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.