We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Application Gateway and Radware Alteon based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the tool's stability and performance."
"I find Application Gateway’s WAF module valuable because it helps prevent layer 7 attacks."
"We find it valuable because it is compatible with our existing Azure solution."
"The solution was very easy to configure. It wasn't hard at all to adjust it to our needs."
"The most valuable features of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway are the policies, the data store they are using, and the cloud platform it operates on."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"The solution provides great automation and it is easy to upgrade service."
"WAF feature replicates the firewall."
"I like the web GUI. It's very intuitive and easy to use."
"Radware has been characterized by being extremely robust. This gives us the confidence to offer our users a continuous service."
"The most valuable aspect is the ability to customize the types of load-balancing scenarios needed for customized applications. Some of the load balancers on the market today are strictly out-of-hand load balancers for SSL or HTTP. Radware Alteon is most useful for customizing in-house applications based on ports and protocols."
"The most valuable aspect is that it establishes user security."
"It is easy to expand. Our clients are enterprise-size."
"The interface is easy, it's friendly, and has good alerting."
"The most valuable features of Radware Alteon are the reverse proxy functionality and the SSL offload and hardware."
"The best part is that we are able to manage it easily. It is easy to manage and easy to integrate with third-party applications."
"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is harder to manage than Imperva. It is not intuitive and stable compared to other products."
"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway could improve by allowing features to use more third-party tools."
"In the next release, the solution could improve the integration with Service Mesh and other Azure Security Services."
"The working speed of the solution needs improvement."
"The graphical interface needs improvement because it is not user friendly."
"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway's first deployment is complex. It needs to improve its pricing."
"It could be easier to change servicing."
"Application Gateway’s limitation is that the private and the public endpoint cannot use the same port."
"The service could be improved by better customer support."
"You need to have pretty good internal knowledge of the solution."
"We’d like the solution to include more security features in the standard license."
"I would like to see future enhancements in security, specifically in threat protection."
"Recently our team was talking about the things you can customize in Alteon and the level of programming that doing so demands. I would like to see more information on how to customize the programming and troubleshoot."
"Their support can be better. The Radware management is very proactive. We can connect to anybody in Radware Management in India. We can even connect with the MD of Radware India. However, their lower level staff should be more proactive towards the customers."
"It can be improved by combining the web application firewall (WAF) facility."
"The community portal does not have a place to find scripts."
More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is ranked 4th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 38 reviews while Radware Alteon is ranked 7th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 33 reviews. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is rated 7.2, while Radware Alteon is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway writes "High stability with built-in rules that reduce alerts and are easy to configure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware Alteon writes "It's a good fit for a small team because the maintenance is easier and you don't need to know how to code". Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is most compared with Citrix NetScaler, AWS WAF, F5 Advanced WAF, Azure Front Door and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas Radware Alteon is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Citrix NetScaler, F5 Advanced WAF, A10 Networks Thunder ADC and HAProxy. See our Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs. Radware Alteon report.
See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors and best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.