We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and SnapLogic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can write external features and transfer the data using JPIMs securely which has been most valuable."
"The product's most valuable feature is scalability."
"Logic Apps helped reduce complexity or development time. For example, if we get documents in the form of images, we can use Logic Apps to extract information from those images. This simplifies our efforts compared to originally using Microsoft APIs to do the same task."
"I am impressed with the tool's UI and analytics."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a nine out of ten, with ten being easy to set up."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is the many available connectors that make automation easy. Additionally, the security of the solution is good."
"The solution is very easy for new users because it includes very good documentation and transparency."
"It's easy to use, and it's stable."
"SnapLogic is an IPA tool that leverages a low code environment to connect to multiple sources, extract data, and store it in Azure data lake."
"SnapLogic is more user-friendly than Boomi in terms of debugging. You can move the mouse to a place, and it will record and show the data easily."
"SnapLogic is a great platform for establishing integrations among various systems or patterns by using any kind of interface. If something is not supported by predefined snaps – snaps are connectors in SnapLogic – you can create them (custom snaps) or write a script."
"What I found most valuable in SnapLogic is the ETL feature, particularly the Transform Snap Pack, for example, any kind of reading or writing on Transform Snaps. Other than that, all the third-party connectivity tools such as the SAP Snap Pack, Salesforce Snap Pack, Workday Snap Pack, even the ServiceNow Snap Pack, I find all those are pretty useful in SnapLogic."
"By using snaps instead of functions in code, you can see the building blocks of the integration visually. This helps a lot."
"The solution is easy to implement and easy to use. It's basically just drag and drop."
"It's more developer-friendly, and development can be done at a faster phase."
"An important tool for building prototypes and MVPs than can seamlessly turn into production jobs"
"The product needs improvement in getting direct access to the code and versioning."
"It would be helpful if the vendor could provide more data connectors."
"The scalability could be improved."
"There could be more AI features included in the product."
"I find the current interface useful, but I could see how others would want the UI bits that are used for creating Logic Apps to be simplified."
"There could be custom code for the product's components."
"It's for a limited kind of application or short Apps. And, not for the complex applications."
"Not all connectors are readily available, though. There are two types: managed connectors and app connectors. Some connectors require you to provide a username and password to connect to platforms like SharePoint or Salesforce. Due to security constraints, some users may prefer not to use these connectors. Instead, they might opt for the HTTP connector."
"The support is the most important improvement they could make."
"The dashboards regarding scheduled tasks need further improvement."
"There is room for improvement with APM management and how task execution looks."
"I would like to see more performance-related dashboards, ones that display the cost of a pipeline, for instance. Also, it would be helpful to have management dashboards for overseeing pipelines and connections."
"Connecting to data behind enterprise firewalls has been tricky."
"The problem is that SnapLogic doesn't offer a wide variety of connectors. For example, integrating with Salesforce is not that easy."
"SnapLogic sits somewhere in the middle. It doesn’t offer enough easy canned integrations for its users like some of the easier to use integration apps."
"What could be improved in SnapLogic is that it was not capable in terms of processing a large number of datasets, but at that point, SnapLogic was evolving. It didn't give a lot of Snaps. I heard recently there are a lot of Snaps getting added and the solution was being enhanced, particularly to connect different data sources. When I was working with SnapLogic six months to one year back, I faced the issue of it not being capable of handling a huge volume of datasets or didn't have much of Snaps, and that was the drawback. If there is any large number of data sets, that's based on or depends on your configuration. If it is a huge volume of data, other traditional ETL tools such as Informatica and Talend can process millions and billions of records, while in SnapLogic, the Snaplex fails or it returns an error in terms of processing that huge volume of data. Informatica, Talend, or any other ETL tool can run for hours in terms of jobs, while SnapLogic jobs fail when the threshold is reached. SnapLogic isn't able to withstand processing, but I don't know if that's still an issue at present, because the solution is getting enhanced and it's been more than six months to one year since I last worked with SnapLogic. There are now a lot of Snaps getting added to the solution, and if it can overcome the limitations I mentioned, SnapLogic could be the go-to tool because currently, it's not being used as much in organizations. It's being used comparatively less compared to other retail tools."
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is ranked 2nd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 29 reviews while SnapLogic is ranked 6th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 21 reviews. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is rated 8.0, while SnapLogic is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps writes "Has different connectors for workflow and comes with low-code feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SnapLogic writes "Easy to set up, easy to use, and is low-code". Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Boomi AtomSphere Integration, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Cloud Platform and TIBCO Cloud Integration, whereas SnapLogic is most compared with AWS Glue, IBM InfoSphere DataStage, Azure Data Factory and Informatica Cloud Data Integration. See our Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. SnapLogic report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
