We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Object Storage and Oracle Database Backup Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Object Storage's best features are the soft delete option and the retention period."
"We can do data queries easily."
"Microsoft Azure Object Storage is an easy-to-use and stable solution."
"It is a stable solution and serve our purposes"
"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward."
"I appreciate the scalability of this solution; it is fully scalable and excellent for certain tasks."
"This solution is easy to use, and performance-wise it is better than others."
"Microsoft Azure Object Storage offers hassle-free usage. It is easy to configure."
"From the database perspective, Oracle is the best."
"It's a scalable product."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to perform encrypted backups after any learning."
"The interface is good."
"The backup is reliable and intuitive."
"Oracle Database Backup Service is an easy-to-use consolidation solution that's dashboard-driven."
"The product's most valuable features are differential and cumulative backup functionality."
"Replication and performance tuning are valuable features."
"We experienced an outage issue recently, which affected its overall stability and reliability."
"They could provide multiple tools to provide you with cost calculations, giving you a better picture or providing better details of the cost calculations over the years."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"Uploading files from the UI has presented some issues. When editing work and once you delete a file, it takes some time to recreate the same file."
"In future releases, I would add something like a better lifecycle management system, and for integration purposes, I would add some stuff related to newer concepts like data products and databases. I would like to have a seamless flow between those things."
"The initial setup is not easy to understand."
"The stability could be improved."
"The setup process could always be a bit easier."
"The solution needs to add an archive function."
"We cannot use the product with other brands."
"Deployment is overly complex and could be streamlined."
"We encounter issues while restoring differential and cumulative backups."
"They should base their strategy according to the country and the regulations there, and focus more on the on-premises deployment."
"The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it."
"The product's technical support services need improvement in terms of response time."
"It's already fast, but still, they could improve the speed."
More Microsoft Azure Object Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Oracle Database Backup Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Azure Object Storage is ranked 9th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 45 reviews while Oracle Database Backup Service is ranked 13th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 10 reviews. Microsoft Azure Object Storage is rated 8.0, while Oracle Database Backup Service is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Object Storage writes "Can be used to safely store big datasets in the cloud at a reasonable price". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database Backup Service writes "A backup solution for data storage and restoration with point-in-time recover". Microsoft Azure Object Storage is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Wasabi and Amazon S3, whereas Oracle Database Backup Service is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon S3, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) and Wasabi. See our Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
