Amazon S3 vs Microsoft Azure Object Storage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
8,712 views|5,262 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
1,007 views|860 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon S3 and Microsoft Azure Object Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Amazon S3 vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage Report (Updated: March 2024).
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I've also used Azure's tool, and S3 is far more stable I haven't seen the same issues on AWS that I'm having on Azure. Amazon CloudFront is way faster. The websites are loading way faster than when you do it on Azure CDN.""My company uses Amazon S3 by default for every single project. I like that you can use it for storing different file formats. Amazon S3 is also the easiest to use compared to other solutions.""The tool helps us with data backup storage of payment files and helps us avoid issues with clients when we miss the data. For instance, in the payment file of my Google client, you can find details of one-to-one transactions like the payment information on the file header, payment ID, payment client ID, group headers, etc. We get these details into the file format of ISO which is the accepted format at JP Morgan & Chase. Once we get the file format, we process it through S3.""Feature-wise, Amazon S3 is the cheapest and it's reliable.""Cloud infrastructure is the most valuable feature.""We can easily connect to the AWS resources.""I used Amazon AWS/S3 solution to prove my concept before deploying it on real hardware. It was a great experience and was really scalable.""The storage factor and data extraction are faster because we can use Redshift for extraction."

More Amazon S3 Pros →

"The features of Microsoft Azure Object Storage that are most valuable are the ones providing encryption. Access is more controlled using private endpoints and SaaS token keys. Many access control features exist.""The solution integrates well with Microsoft Office 365 and includes important features such as SIEM, storage, SQL, and Cosmos DB.""The product's initial setup phase is straightforward.""Microsoft Azure Object Storage provides a platform for uploading or downloading big datasets.""The best thing is it's on the cloud. It's easily accessible to everyone through a mobile device, tablet, or laptop. Secondly, it's secure. Like any URL shared will not work after a few hours. Only the person concerned who has that URL can use it within a few hours to download the document. After that, it expires. Thirdly, we all keep an archive. For example, if there are old documents, they are still stored over there. Another nice Azure feature is that they have the regional set up for that storage, and there's no downtime, and I'm grateful for that. We don't have to worry, because it's secure. If something goes down, they have other copies of it on a separate server, and it's accessible.""We have had a good experience with customer service and support.""Microsoft Azure Object Storage offers hassle-free usage. It is easy to configure.""We can easily create a storage layer in any system."

More Microsoft Azure Object Storage Pros →

Cons
"Maybe it could be a bit cheaper.""The tool needs to improve its flexibility in support.""Technical support could have a faster response time.""When we need to find the queries there is no user interface, it is the only textual format that is bulky. If we need some data we will use Athena for queries and we will get results. When comparing this solution to others, such as DataDog, they provide a wonderful UI, and user-friendly dashboards, and many other features that this solution is lacking.""An encryption mechanism and storage optimization could be added.""Amazon S3 should have more frequent updates.""The down side is the web app should be aware of all the features that S3 provides in order to leverage its full potential.""In the next release, I think that it would be good to have wizards that would update into specific applications, for example, a one-touch configuration in Pagemaker."

More Amazon S3 Cons →

"We experienced an outage issue recently, which affected its overall stability and reliability.""The solution needs to improve the custom domain integration with static web pages. Even though Blog Storage is providing the static content hosting feature, due to the custom domain availability, the integration is not available. In most cases, we withdraw from that service and use our app service to host our static data feeds.""They could improve AI and ML-based modules. They should add more modules based on artificial intelligence and machine learning. Pricing is a little bit tricky with Microsoft Azure. They do provide the estimates, but it is not easy to guess the exact amount that we will be billed after a month or two because it is based on usage. This is a little confusing.""The setup process could always be a bit easier.""Microsoft Azure Object Storage has had a number of failures last week due to the lack of hardware available to support the resources. However, it was only for a short time, approximately two days.""In future releases, I would add something like a better lifecycle management system, and for integration purposes, I would add some stuff related to newer concepts like data products and databases. I would like to have a seamless flow between those things.""The password retrieval process was very difficult.""Microsoft Azure Object Storage is a pretty expensive solution."

More Microsoft Azure Object Storage Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "With S3 Standard, there is not a charge for deletion of objects."
  • "This solution has reasonable pricing and a low cost."
  • "The licensing is pay as you go, and I'm happy with the pricing."
  • "The cost of storage is cheap. However, the cost to have a better interface can get expensive. We are using Athena for this purpose and if we did some heavy queries the cost will start adding up. When the Athena query is running, it will scan the bucket and they charge for how many GBs we are going to scan. The function of scanning has a lot of costs attached to it, this is a negative point."
  • "The price of the Amazon S3 is low. The license model is based on what you use."
  • "The price of Amazon S3 depends on various variables. However, the price overall is fair."
  • "The price of Amazon S3 could be less expensive."
  • "The license of Amazon S3 is based on volume, capacity, and time. The overall price of the solution could improve. The support has to be added if you want it at an additional cost."
  • More Amazon S3 Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The cost is based on the amount of traffic and we paid approximately 18 lakh Rupees ($25,000 USD) last year."
  • "For the cloud, you get charges every day if you are going to download anything, besides the cost for storage those charges are always there."
  • "The cost of this solution is high compared to others, although there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
  • "The cost should be reduced to make it more competitive."
  • "Pricing is always confusing for all Microsoft products. For this solution, they do provide the estimates, but it is not easy to guess the exact amount that we will be billed."
  • "We have a separate package and pay extra for additional technical support."
  • "The licensing cost of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is monthly. We have two types of licenses. One is the EA enterprise license and the other is a CSP license."
  • "It has a pay-as-you-go model. So, you are only paying for what you store. It's an attractive model. You don't pay for a set; you pay for what you actually use."
  • More Microsoft Azure Object Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Amazon S3 is very flexible and provides high storage.
    Top Answer:The solution is cost-effective because it is based on a pay-as-you-go model, where I can purchase and use it according to my needs.
    Top Answer:No direct connector is available to connect Amazon S3 with other tools like MicroStrategy. So, I have to use a third party and connect to it.
    Top Answer:Our storage capacity is cheap because we have a committed discount.
    Top Answer:The product hangs sometimes. The password retrieval process was very difficult.
    Ranking
    Views
    8,712
    Comparisons
    5,262
    Reviews
    49
    Average Words per Review
    377
    Rating
    8.8
    Views
    1,007
    Comparisons
    860
    Reviews
    31
    Average Words per Review
    375
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    S3, Simple Storage Service
    Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, Azure Object Storage, MS Azure Object Storage
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Simple Storage Service is storage for the Internet. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.

    Amazon S3 has a simple web services interface that you can use to store and retrieve any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web. It gives any developer access to the same highly scalable, reliable, fast, inexpensive data storage infrastructure that Amazon uses to run its own global network of web sites. The service aims to maximize benefits of scale and to pass those benefits on to developers.

    REST-based object storage for unstructured data in the cloud

    • Store infrequently accessed data in a low-cost cool storage tier
    • Store frequently accessed application data in a hot storage tier
    • Stream video, audio, and other media to web, mobile, or desktop applications
    • Power big data analytics
    • Access your data more securely, both over the wire and at rest
    Sample Customers
    Netflix, Airbnb, Thomson Reuters, Zillow, Alert Logic
    Umbraco, Xbox, Radioshack, 343 Industries, McKesson
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company31%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Real Estate/Law Firm10%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization68%
    Computer Software Company6%
    Financial Services Firm4%
    Manufacturing Company3%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Media Company10%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Retailer11%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise49%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business8%
    Midsize Enterprise72%
    Large Enterprise21%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise61%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon S3 vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon S3 vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon S3 is ranked 1st in Public Cloud Storage Services with 68 reviews while Microsoft Azure Object Storage is ranked 9th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 44 reviews. Amazon S3 is rated 8.8, while Microsoft Azure Object Storage is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon S3 writes "Cloud Conversations: AWS S3 Overview". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Object Storage writes "Can be used to safely store big datasets in the cloud at a reasonable price". Amazon S3 is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, Amazon S3 Glacier and Nutanix Unified Storage, whereas Microsoft Azure Object Storage is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage and Wasabi. See our Amazon S3 vs. Microsoft Azure Object Storage report.

    See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

    We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.