We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway and Perimeter 81 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"It is a stable solution in our company, and we monitor critical health and performance parameters daily and weekly."
"It is easy to configure."
"The best feature is the ability to connect from anywhere."
"The interoperability with various firewall and access gateway vendors is one of this solution's most valuable features"
"The point-to-site is pretty good for the B2C stuff. It's fairly straightforward to set up."
"The solution is user-friendly."
"It is scalable and depends on your chosen network bandwidth."
"All of our offices are using Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway. The solution is scalable."
"The benefits are really built into the underlying protocol, however, Perimeter81 makes these available in a user-friendly way."
"It helps to quickly get access to the pages I need."
"It is a scalable solution."
"SD-WAN is one of the primary solutions offered by Perimeter 81."
"It has provided a seamless gateway to much-needed platforms."
"Distributing the agent was very simple, allowing us to enforce security posture on our devices (i.e. S1, Disk-encryption, etc.)."
"It keeps us all accountable and ensures secure internet connections while we all work remotely."
"Perimeter 81 provides a very secure and non-disruptive experience."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Documentation and configuration settings can be improved."
"Considering my past interactions with Microsoft's support team, it is difficult to get the right support unless you find the right person to speak with from the customer support team."
"The connectivity should be faster."
"The product must provide a single sign-on."
"The solution must provide metrics to monitor the inbound and outbound traffic easily."
"The marketing material in the portal is not very user-friendly."
"I would like for them to improve the troubleshooting features. We have some problems with traffic and I can't identify where the problem is coming from. I have to open a ticket with support until it gets resolved. Microsoft doesn't offer enough tools to resolve the issue."
"Microsoft could work on having micro VPNs to integrate with mobile devices."
"The platform still lacks relevant dashboards and the ability to customize them based on our needs."
"There are a few areas where the solution could be improved. For instance, we sometimes encounter connectivity issues, which can be problematic. Recently, I experienced a connectivity issue while trying to move to Azure. Connectivity issues can be quite frustrating."
"There is a very small amount of downtime."
"I don't know if it is technically feasible, however, if the Desktop App could be used as a Web App or a Chrome Extension it would be very nice."
"Perimeter 81 could enhance its reporting and analytics capabilities to provide more detailed insights into network activity."
"It would be nice to have a notification sound when Perimeter81 disconnects, as I sometimes don't notice when the icon shows that it's disconnected, and I end up wasting time waiting for my browser to load a page that shows an error, usually error 404."
"The overall UI could be improved and updated to bring a simpler feel to the application."
"One of the more negative experiences using Perimeter 81 is the fact that I am logged off after a pre-determined amount of time which cuts off access to some of my company's resources."
Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is ranked 4th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 19 reviews while Perimeter 81 is ranked 8th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 22 reviews. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is rated 8.2, while Perimeter 81 is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway writes "A scalable and reliable solution that enables users to connect to older protocols that other products do not have". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Perimeter 81 writes "Great SAML and SCIM support with the ability to deploy site-2-site tunnels with specific IP restrictions". Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Fortinet FortiClient, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and Google Cloud VPN, whereas Perimeter 81 is most compared with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Cato SASE Cloud Platform, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Cloudflare Access and Check Point Remote Access VPN. See our Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway vs. Perimeter 81 report.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
