Microsoft Dynamics GP vs Sage MAS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
1,184 views|921 comparisons
86% willing to recommend
Sage Logo
434 views|396 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Dynamics GP and Sage MAS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. Sage MAS Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is strong in integration.""You can track everything from beginning to end quite easily.""The system is easy to customize and has user-friendly access. ​""The solution is easy to use.""We have gained the capability to control and address various issues within the financial module effectively.""It is a tried and tested ERP system which if used correctly, is definitely a very good program for managing all aspects of a business from customer sales, and receivables management, to payable management and finance reporting. So, it's super critical for any mid-sized company.""The solution is easy to use and not complicated. Also, it is easy to get trained on. Also, there is good information available on the web. The GP community is quite broad and there are many blogs online.""The fixed assets, payroll, the data module, and user-friendliness are most valuable."

More Microsoft Dynamics GP Pros →

"The technical support is very good.""The product provides consistent updates and upgrades."

More Sage MAS Pros →

Cons
"This is now a legacy product, so they're phasing it out over time.""As technology changes, I would say probably in the area of chart up account needs improvement because chart up account is a string. So if they make it more flexible.""Dynamics GP could be improved in terms of its usability and modernization.""There should also be extra redundancy when posting to modules. We use different sets of books such as CashBook and CheckBooks therefore if I select the wrong one the solution allows the transaction to just pass without warning.""What could be improved is the functionality of Dynamics GP because it requires a lot of development by the programmers and the company in order to integrate into a solution.""The purchase order and processing aspects of the solution should be improved.""Initially, we encountered challenges, particularly with users transitioning from their previous applications.""Many of our customers are migrating to the cloud rather than staying on-premises."

More Microsoft Dynamics GP Cons →

"The vendor stopped supporting the solution on the Linux platform.""We're definitely looking at a new system because everything in this product needs improving."

More Sage MAS Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Its pricing and licensing are high. Of course, we all know that it is Microsoft."
  • "​We evaluated some local products, because of the pricing, but this product has better features and support."
  • "For us, in our local currency, it costs us around 5 million Botswanan Pulas a year. It's quite a lot of money."
  • "The solution's price is steep."
  • "I think the tool is competitively priced and it's more of a one-time investment with a low annual renewal fee."
  • "I would say that the pricing is moderate, not cheap, and not expensive. There are many more expensive ERPs than GP, and there are less expensive as well, so it is moderately priced."
  • "In comparison to other ERP systems, the pricing is not necessarily inexpensive, but it can be considered more cost-effective."
  • "It is an affordable solution."
  • More Microsoft Dynamics GP Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is reasonable."
  • More Sage MAS Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ERP solutions are best for your needs.
    770,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is the ability to easily update and maintain accurate data across all aspects of our operations.
    Top Answer:The approximate cost of Dynamics GP can vary depending on factors like the number of users, additional modules, and infrastructure requirements. On average, it may cost around $50,000 per year for a… more »
    Top Answer:Dynamics GP could be improved in terms of its usability and modernization. As a legacy application, it is not on par with newer ERP systems like Dynamics 365 or SAP. Microsoft's plans to end support… more »
    Top Answer:The product provides consistent updates and upgrades.
    Top Answer:The vendor stopped supporting the solution on the Linux platform. We can only use it on Windows. It is very bad. I don't know why they discontinued support for Linux. Now we are supposed to use… more »
    Ranking
    13th
    out of 69 in ERP
    Views
    1,184
    Comparisons
    921
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    447
    Rating
    7.9
    22nd
    out of 69 in ERP
    Views
    434
    Comparisons
    396
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    474
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Dynamics GP, MS Dynamics GP
    MAS
    Learn More
    Overview

    Microsoft Dynamics GP is a complete enterprise resource planning (ERP) solution for small and medium-sized businesses. Dynamics GP helps you gain greater control over your financials, inventory, and operations. It’s easy to implement and use and empowers informed decisions that lead to business success.

    Integrated floral management system with order processing, design room operations, customer service performance, web site integration.
    Sample Customers
    Rural Metro, WASH Multifamily Laundry, Kauffman Center for the Performing Arts, Elcome International LLC, Batteries Plus Corporate Stores, Catalogic Software, Choate Rosemary Hall
    Vesta Stoves, Power Distribution LLC, Electronics Inc, Pinstripe & Pearls
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Government20%
    Retailer20%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company11%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Real Estate/Law Firm9%
    Construction Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Real Estate/Law Firm11%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business45%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise53%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise56%
    Buyer's Guide
    Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. Sage MAS
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. Sage MAS and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Dynamics GP is ranked 13th in ERP with 22 reviews while Sage MAS is ranked 22nd in ERP with 3 reviews. Microsoft Dynamics GP is rated 7.8, while Sage MAS is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Dynamics GP writes "A user-friendly solution for accounting and sales purchase model with all options in one frame". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sage MAS writes "The product is easy to use and provides consistent updates and upgrades". Microsoft Dynamics GP is most compared with Microsoft Dynamics AX, Oracle E-Business Suite, Epicor ERP, SAP ERP and SAP S/4HANA, whereas Sage MAS is most compared with SAP ERP. See our Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. Sage MAS report.

    See our list of best ERP vendors.

    We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.