We performed a comparison between Microsoft .NET Framework and WebLogic Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Infrastructure solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The .NET Framework is a very good framework. It does what I need it to do."
"User-friendly and straightforward."
"The Windows Communication Foundation is the biggest advantage we get from the .NET Framework."
"The most valuable feature is customization."
"The most valuable features for us are web frameworks like MVC, Web API, and WCS."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft .NET Framework is debugging."
"If we take low code, no code platform such as RPA platforms, you might end up writing 100 lines of code and you might do it in a single line of code using. NET."
"Given that it's cross-platform right now, where you can use it on Windows and Mac, that is the single most significant feature that has resulted in wider adoption of .NET."
"The solution is useful for centralizing data."
"The most valuable feature of WebLogic is it has excellent performance and stability compared to the previous solution we used."
"A valuable feature is its integration with Oracle Database."
"This is a robust solution."
"The transaction handling of WebLogic and the way it is designed is excellent."
"The product is reliable."
"WebLogic adds a lot of value to business and investments."
"The feature that I have found to be the most valuable is the ease of deployment."
"The solution could improve by optimizing the memory for better performance."
"They could enhance support for Python within Visual Studio, as integrating Microsoft products with other frameworks can present a steep learning curve."
"If AI could be incorporated in Microsoft .NET Framework it would be helpful."
"Difficult to scale this product for large organizations."
"The product’s reliability needs improvement."
"You need to have the technical expertise to use this product."
"The product is nearing its sunset, and we think that by 2028, we won't get support anymore"
"Microsoft has its own product called Blazor, but I don't think it's quite as powerful yet as React or Angular. That's an area for improvement."
"This solution would benefit from the inclusion of a ripple start function for clusters."
"I think the support could be much better."
"The licensing for the solution is pretty expensive. It may be the most expensive solution, if you were to compare it to the competition."
"Lacking a solution for smaller applications."
"Sometimes there are issues when we work on a VM because people use it to put all of their reports on it at the same time. Then I have to restart and rebuild the machine."
"I noticed a few areas for improvement in WebLogic Suite. If you use the pure play higher-availability features, then yes, it can be switched over to the other system from the high-availability point of view, but that comes with a certain price. If you prefer simpler high-availability, that requires manual intervention. I'd also recommend a tuning feature in WebLogic Suite because it's not self-tuning, and this means you need thorough expertise to do the tuning and leverage the best benefit out of it. If Oracle makes WebLogic Suite automated or self-driven, then it becomes a wonderful product, similar to what Oracle did for the Autonomous Database which is self-driven or has an autonomous operating system. If automation is added in the next release of the solution, combined with more affordable pricing, though as a technical person, I know how much goes into having automation as a feature, and it could be difficult to lower the price, but if Oracle can do it, then that would make WebLogic Suite better."
"The content search is not easy."
"I would like to see the licensing policy simplified."
Microsoft .NET Framework is ranked 4th in Application Infrastructure with 47 reviews while WebLogic Suite is ranked 11th in Application Infrastructure with 31 reviews. Microsoft .NET Framework is rated 8.4, while WebLogic Suite is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft .NET Framework writes "Intuitive, easier to develop, maintain, and migrate from the old framework to newer versions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WebLogic Suite writes "Simple setup, reliable, and performs well". Microsoft .NET Framework is most compared with IIS, Magic xpa Application Platform, JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, Apache Web Server and SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal, whereas WebLogic Suite is most compared with Oracle SOA Suite, Oracle WebCenter, Apache Web Server and NGINX Plus. See our Microsoft .NET Framework vs. WebLogic Suite report.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
