We performed a comparison between Microsoft Power Apps and Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."It's very easy to build an app using this solution."
"It is stable and reliable."
"The solution becomes easier the set up once you get used to it."
"The flows are good because they can be used in a variety of situations."
"The most valuable features are low-code and fast development."
"There is value in being able to collect and compare information in real-time to present alternatives for correcting vulnerabilities."
"The most valuable feature is the simple data connectivity components."
"The solution is very straightforward. Its context is obvious and everything is easy to understand."
"You don't need a dedicated IDE to develop. You can work from any browser, which is very convenient. And, with the cloud concept, your code is stored in the cloud, so you can modify it from anywhere, at any time."
"The initial setup is easy."
"VBS is another tool that allows users to create enterprise applications without needing to store their projects in traditional databases like SQL."
"The most valuable feature was the visual drag and drop on the components."
"The tool is very easy to use."
"The area where this product can be improved is the documentation. When we get stuck it's with the documentation when we are not able to find the codes we need."
"There is room for improvement in error handling and debugging."
"The portal and canvas apps need to be improved and brought up to speed."
"When we talk of integrating with external applications, that's one area where, even today, I had to loop in my code developers. If this area can be streamlined so that my techno-functional consultants, who are on-site, can immediately start working on something without the assistance of developers, that would be ideal."
"The editor in the Web browser could be improved because it can be difficult to implement the commands in the buttons."
"The price could be lower."
"I would like to see more improvement, for example, in direct collaboration."
"We would like to see some improvement in the cost of the solution when an organization has a more complex network structure. The advanced connectors are very expensive, which discourages our customers from implementing it."
"The initial setup of Oracle VBCS can be challenging for those unfamiliar with DBS."
"There was an attempt to enable front-end development, it did what it intended to do, but the side effects were too bad."
"The tool has minor bugs."
"I would improve the license structure as, for some companies, it may seem a little bit expensive, depending on what they're doing."
"The feature called "action chains" could use a bit of enhancement."
More Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 77 reviews while Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is ranked 18th in Rapid Application Development Software with 5 reviews. Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8, while Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service writes "Offers low-code/no-code concept makes development much easier and faster and offers good community support as the development team actively answers questions on the community every day". Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and Microsoft Azure App Service, whereas Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Studio Creatio, Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI).
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.