We performed a comparison between Microsoft Power Apps and Pillir based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."Creating a PowerApp is very easy. All I do is link and share the result with my colleagues. Deployment is very fast."
"For our purposes, it is quite scalable."
"Microsoft PowerApps allows you to simplify business processes and user experience. You can also create responsive applications and canvas apps through this solution. It's an easy to scale, stable, and low-code solution."
"There's a lot of online knowledge on the solution, to the point where new users can basically teach themselves how to use the solution."
"If you want something that you can use for cellphones, multiple tablets, and things like that, you can use PowerApps for the front end. It gathers all the information, and the information goes somewhere else."
"The cloud aspect has been great. We don't have to do a lot of research in order to begin integrations. It's so easy to integrate with other solutions."
"I like the containerization of Azure."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"I love how they took the MIT Scratch concept and implemented it into the in-app backend. It makes the app creation so much more intuitive and easy to use."
"I believe that this is the only product in the market that truly supports offline capabilities in an SAP environment."
"The scalability of the solution could improve."
"The flexibility and the user interface need improvement."
"The documentation isn't great. It's only 75% of what you need to know. If you go beyond that and run into issues, it's really not going to help you."
"One area where the solution lacks is the limited size of the database it offers its users."
"The solution should have more integration with other platforms."
"Microsoft PowerApps could improve the speed of Power Automate, it is not very fast."
"Microsoft should combine both the web and the mobile environment with all of the layers of development into one package."
"The area where this product can be improved is the documentation. When we get stuck it's with the documentation when we are not able to find the codes we need."
"The modernizer element should convert a higher percentage of the ABAP code, moving it from approximately 75%, closer to 100%."
"While we're not in a place of letting LOB analysts build apps, at some point, we may want to give them a bit more freedom - as long as we can limit their ability to harm the ERP data. I would like to see more tools pertaining to this area."
Earn 20 points
Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 77 reviews while Pillir is ranked 42nd in Rapid Application Development Software. Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8, while Pillir is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pillir writes "Helpful dashboard, supports offline capabilities for SAP, professional support, and a simple pricing model". Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and Microsoft Azure App Service, whereas Pillir is most compared with .
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.