We performed a comparison between Microsoft Power Automate and Nintex RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Technical support is available regionally and it's quite good."
"AI Builder is a good add-on."
"The sequencer programming mode's ease of use is its most valuable aspect. The ease of calling out the functions in a sequence, basically from the functional side, is great."
"The pricing of the solution is competitive, which is good for the Romanian market."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to integrate across multiple systems."
"The product provides valuable integration with other Microsoft tools."
"The connectors are a very good feature."
"The most valuable feature is the ability and ease of linking multiple connectors within the same flow."
"Nintex RPA often includes security features, including encryption and user access controls, which ensure the protection of sensitive data and compliance with security standards."
"Nintex RPA doesn't require much coding, and you can drag and drop the activities."
"The initial setup process is easy."
"It should be more stable, and their technical support should be faster. It should also have more integration with tools from other vendors, such as SAP and Oracle, and technology partners, such as Salesforce."
"Sometimes, Microsoft changes the game rules, and the free tools are no longer free, which makes it too hard to explain to customers. It is a SaaS service, so the cost is calculated based on the execution hours. However, we don't know the background of this cost because we cannot touch the infrastructure. They can be more open to developers or customers about this. The infrastructure part must be open for the customers."
"It would be great if it was able to integrate more with various other platforms. It would make development easier."
"The solution could offer more specific training. There should be more examples of what the functions can do and more instructions and explanations to the process."
"I think the language Microsoft Power Automate uses when you do expressions could be better. What they use is not a popular programming language. It would be better for Microsoft to find a more popular programming language, such as Python. It would take away the whole no-code aspect of the solution but you don't need to write that many lines of code to improve something in a process. Instead of no-code, they could be a low-code environment."
"The thing which needs the most improvement is really the documentation. It should have better details of the processes."
"The connectors and the integration capability can be improved. Microsoft RPA is a growing platform, and it is not yet particularly mature."
"The tool should improve its price."
"Further simplifying the low-code development process can attract a broader user base by making automation accessible to those with minimal technical skills."
"Nintex RPA is not suitable for PDF automation."
"There could be some features to fix compatibility issues with firmware."
Microsoft Power Automate is ranked 2nd in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 123 reviews while Nintex RPA is ranked 28th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 3 reviews. Microsoft Power Automate is rated 7.8, while Nintex RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Power Automate writes "Provides valuable integration with other Microsoft tools". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nintex RPA writes "Helps automate tasks and increases efficiency but does stop working sometimes". Microsoft Power Automate is most compared with UiPath, Automation Anywhere (AA), Blue Prism, IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) and Blue Prism Cloud, whereas Nintex RPA is most compared with UiPath, Kryon RPA and Automation Anywhere (AA). See our Microsoft Power Automate vs. Nintex RPA report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
