We performed a comparison between Microsoft Purview Data Governance and SAP Data Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Governance solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Their data labeling or data classification is particularly valuable because we want to categorize all of our data into confidential, public, or internal."
"The documentation is very exhaustive. Anyone can go ahead and try different use cases."
"It has notable features for maximizing the value of your data. The data discovery and the data analytics parts are great both on-premises and on-cloud."
"The time to onboard is pretty short."
"Purview's greatest benefit for us is data discovery."
"Purview helped us automate and control our data without having to rely on people to manually tag documents with specific retention periods."
"I really like the entire system for auto-labeling content. It's a very refined system. I use the Keyword Query Language to define refined string-based metadata, and then I can really go deep into the specific data with the specific properties labeled in such and such a way."
"One of the best features is the classification rules, especially the scan rule sets. They are really useful, especially when we need to understand the current data the company has to ensure that all the problematic data can be put under someone's responsibility."
"It is robust solution."
"The new workflow engine is based on the web app rather than the Java-based approach."
"Data quality has been a highly requested feature among customers."
"The custom data classification for the African region needs to be improved."
"The API needs some improvement when connecting to non-Microsoft API sources. This is a limiting factor."
"As Microsoft Purview got a little more mature, the deployments got a little more complex, as we were kind of seeing that there are a lot of ways, like there were a hundred ways to do one thing or less."
"The product needs improvement to edit the number of assets. It needs to be more inuitive as well."
"There are some limitations with regard to the lineage of data from different parts of the system."
"Support should be improved in the form of good documentation and video lessons where a person can check things out. There is a community, but it takes a lot of time if we want to get an answer to a question."
"Overcoming certain control issues would significantly enhance our overall satisfaction."
"SAP should come up with specialized services as per their customer's requirements."
"I would like to see harmonizing with some of the external third-party products so that it will all be within SAP."
More Microsoft Purview Data Governance Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Purview Data Governance is ranked 1st in Data Governance with 51 reviews while SAP Data Governance is ranked 23rd in Data Governance with 2 reviews. Microsoft Purview Data Governance is rated 7.8, while SAP Data Governance is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Purview Data Governance writes "User friendly with good documentation but needs to cover more non-Microsoft use cases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Data Governance writes "A robust solution that establishes rules, policies, and procedures". Microsoft Purview Data Governance is most compared with Collibra Governance, Alation Data Catalog, Varonis Platform, Informatica Axon and Ataccama ONE Platform, whereas SAP Data Governance is most compared with Alation Data Catalog and Informatica Axon. See our Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs. SAP Data Governance report.
See our list of best Data Governance vendors.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.