We performed a comparison between Microsoft Sentillion eXpresso and Okta Workforce Identity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Security is the best feature of Microsoft Azure Sentinel. It has its own base security. Our customers like that the security is available in Azure."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and its robustness."
"It is flexible and easy to install."
"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the integration with external websites one-factor authentication."
"The support for YubiKey is really good because you don't actually have to type in your username and password."
"The product is easy to use."
"It is dependent on the evolution of your user base. It depends on usage per user, so the more sign-ins there are, the more expensive it becomes, so it works best for smaller companies from a financial perspective."
"It has a wide range of MFA options. I prefer "Okta Verify" out of them all."
"We face no challenges in integrating the product with our legacy systems."
"Workforce Identity offers a comprehensive access management solution with multi-factor authentication, total control, and features like app access management, identity governance, and administration tools such as certification and access request management. These are typically found in identity management solutions, but Okta integrates them seamlessly into its user interface."
"The shortcomings in the stability need improvement."
"We had some feedback from customers who have said it was a confusing product. The product is confusing to use for the end-user. For example, they do not know how to migrate the Azure Sentinel, but others have liked the product that has started working on it."
"You can't hide the device when you're checking logs."
"Okta Workforce Identity could improve the way passwords are reset and how it interfaces with Microsoft."
"SSO and MFA for improved end-user experience, and protection against password spray attacks, account password self-service."
"I would appreciate it if Okta Workforce Identity becomes more user-friendly. Its API technology is complicated. Certain applications may pose challenges in terms of integration, especially when they require IDP technologies that aren't easily codable. While I can't provide specific examples, some applications may not integrate with Okta Workforce Identity."
"The integration with third-party tools needs to be improved."
"The solution can be quite expensive."
"The solution’s policies are difficult to understand due to the policy methods. They use authentication. The solution’s workflow is also difficult and not very active. They need to have proper documentation on it. In the next release, I would like to see the workflows being more digestible."
"It only facilitates provisioning and not de-provisioning."
More Microsoft Sentillion eXpresso Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Sentillion eXpresso is ranked 18th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 3 reviews while Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 4th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 56 reviews. Microsoft Sentillion eXpresso is rated 9.0, while Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Sentillion eXpresso writes "Offers robustness and ease of use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". Microsoft Sentillion eXpresso is most compared with , whereas Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Google Cloud Identity, SailPoint IdentityIQ, Saviynt and Auth0. See our Microsoft Sentillion eXpresso vs. Okta Workforce Identity report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.