We performed a comparison between Moodle and SAP SuccessFactors Learning based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: SAP SuccessFactors Learning is notable for its comprehensive catalog, useful assignment profile feature, and seamless integration with other software solutions. Moodle provides flexibility, various customization options, and a supportive community for collaborative modifications and adaptations. Users of SAP SuccessFactors Learning want an updated interface, enhanced user management and integration, and a more flexible front end. Moodle could enhance its student interface, mobile access, insights, and reporting.
Service and Support: Some SAP SuccessFactors Learning customers have praised the efficient and knowledgeable assistance they've received, while others have faced challenges in communicating with the support team. Users praised Moodle support for its timely resolution of issues, but others find it insufficient, particularly without additional help from a Moodle-certified partner.
Ease of Deployment: Setting up SAP SuccessFactors Learning is more difficult and intricate compared to Moodle. The migration of learning items from an older system can be problematic and outdated. The initial setup for Moodle can be simple or complicated depending on the user's experience and the chosen deployment method. Moodle's deployment is generally considered to be straightforward, but some users may require the assistance of developers or professional services.
Pricing: Users consider the SAP SuccessFactors Learning's initial fee for implementation and ongoing support to be costly. Moodle provides various pricing plans, including a free open source version with additional charges for customization and support.
ROI: SAP SuccessFactors Learning's ROI depends on factors like organization size and implementation goals. Users suggest referring to user reviews or case studies specific to your industry. Moodle has proven valuable for organizations, as it saves time and money by reducing the need for extensive involvement in tests and quizzes. It is considered a worthwhile investment for training purposes.
Comparison Results: Our users prefer SAP SuccessFactors Learning over Moodle. It offers an intuitive interface, easy-to-use training, a strong catalog, and smooth integration with other solutions. It also improves resource allocation and access functions, making tasks easier to perform. On the other hand, Moodle is praised for its flexibility and customization options, but it lacks a user-friendly interface, requires extensive training, and has limited support options. Overall, SAP SuccessFactors Learning provides a more comprehensive and efficient learning management solution.
"The customization features of Moodle significantly enhance the learning experience for our users."
"It doesn't take long to learn how to use it and to set up basic courses and things like that."
"This is a scalable solution. We have had 30,000 students using the solution. During COVID, we were able to accommodate a 500% increase in traffic."
"What I liked most about Moodle was that I could create nice online quizzes. It takes very little time to do. You don't have to even read the paper, it automatically evaluates the quizzes. It gives the student grades and provides a lot of useful statistics. For example, it indicates which question was the hardest, easiest, and where students made the most mistakes. Everything is available to you. You couldn't do this in regular paper test hard copies. This was my first use case."
"The most valuable feature of Moodle is the exam question shuffle. Students in the classroom will all have different question list numbers. For example, one student's question one will be another student's question ten."
"The number of permissions that are available and different ways to report and get the information out are the most valuable features. We have been able to get precise bits of information out, and we have also been able to delegate a lot."
"Almost all the activity modules are available inside the courses, so that makes our training easier and more comfortable."
"The product's most valuable feature is the ability to import and export documents for courses, assessments, and questionnaires in any format."
"The product offers a lot of information which we can share with systems."
"I like the product because it has logically synchronized modules."
"I find the user interface user-friendly compared to the initial application."
"The analytics and reporting features are very helpful."
"SAP SuccessFactors Learning is highly scalable."
"SAP SuccessFactors Learning's most valuable features are accessibility and updated UX. The solution can be accessed from outside of the office network and the user's experience is good."
"The solution is a user-friendly application for learning, designing, and setting up courses."
"The learning features are great."
"The biggest area for improvement is the UI. They should also make the navigation simpler to understand. They've recently introduced a new way of having navigation work in Moodle, but they all look very similar."
"It would be a benefit if there was an easy single sign-on with social media services for Moodle. There are some plugins that I tried, but they didn't work seamlessly. it is a work in progress. Having the single sign-on with social media services would be appreciated because in my school we are using Google suite and the main reason why we use Google Classroom is that it is integrated seamlessly with the suite."
"One aspect that I found a bit confusing was the dual editing system, where you could edit the layout of the course separately from editing the content."
"The ability to input modified, individual, independent grades in a grade center component is not just hard. It almost always requires you to get tech involved. When you're dealing with a learning system where you have people in an open enrollment with all different levels of learning modes or methodologies, and as well as a worldwide student body, you end up with situations where you have to absolutely exempt somebody from a grade or an assignment and enter a new, different kind of assignment because of their skillset or lack thereof. You can't do that in Moodle. It is virtually impossible to do that in Moodle without having a tech do it for you, and when you have to have that level of tech support, it becomes problematic. They need to fix the grade book center. It is the part where you do evaluations. They need to fix it so that the individual professors can make changes directly without having to get a hold of tech support to do it for them."
"The solution could be improved if support was an integral part of the whole solution. There are a few challenges in terms of performance due to Moodle being a free-to-use platform but these can be overcome with the use of their support team."
"Where Moodle could definitely improve is the user interface. You have a lot of themes and you can customize themes, but if you are going to use Moodle off the shelf, even with a hosting company, a lot of training is involved. Training is available, but if your faculty or your development team isn't highly technical, it's going to be a challenge, whereas there are other interfaces that are much easier, but they don't do as much. So, there is a give and take there. If Moodle could find a way to make the user interface for the instructional designers and the learners more intuitive, it probably would be a huge improvement. The manager area and the admin area are fine, but when it comes to the people who are using the system but might not be highly technical, it needs improvement."
"Setting up groups and allocating privacy settings to different groups is quite complicated."
"Moodle should improve the interface. You can download plugins, such as templates, and use them in Moodle, but they're limited. The interface component in Moodle can improve for students because we always have to train every student on how to use some of each feature. The solution overall could be more user-friendly."
"The GUI and dashboards are areas in the solution with shortcomings where improvements are required."
"I am talking about SAP in general, so there are multiple screens that you have to go through, and it takes some time to get used to it."
"The product's configuration process needs improvement."
"The solution should have a more user-friendly dashboard because its current dashboard is not so great."
"The initial installation could be a bit easier."
"What needs improvement in SAP SuccessFactors Learning is the user interface. The user management and the integration of the whole suite could also be improved. The solution also needs to be modernized because at the moment, it's a little bit outdated. It's old-fashioned, and though it has a data import feature, that's just plain outdated. SAP SuccessFactors Learning doesn't have any cutting-edge features."
"The application integration between cloud and on-premises storage has been completed. However, there is still room for improvement in integrating EC and SAP applications."
"The technical support team has room for improvement."
Moodle is ranked 2nd in Learning Management Systems (LMS) with 26 reviews while SAP SuccessFactors Learning is ranked 4th in Learning Management Systems (LMS) with 23 reviews. Moodle is rated 8.0, while SAP SuccessFactors Learning is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Moodle writes "Inexpensive and pretty easy to use, but not easily adaptable for an individual". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP SuccessFactors Learning writes "An easy-to-deploy and stable solution helpful for multiple HR-related activities". Moodle is most compared with Google Classroom, CYPHER Learning, Chamilo LMS, Cornerstone Learning and TalentLMS, whereas SAP SuccessFactors Learning is most compared with Workday, Litmos, Cornerstone Learning, Wombat Security Education Platform and EdCast. See our Moodle vs. SAP SuccessFactors Learning report.
See our list of best Learning Management Systems (LMS) vendors.
We monitor all Learning Management Systems (LMS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.