We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and SAP Process Orchestration based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: When choosing a Business-to-Business Middleware tool Mule Anypoint Platform slightly nudges ahead of SAP Process Orchestration. PeerSpot users feel Mule Anypoint Platform can help organizations simplify the development of products and increase productivity. The solution provides a valuable API toolkit and intuitive monitoring capabilities. Many users feel SAP Process Orchestration should be more scalable and user friendly.
"The initial setup is quite easy because the solution has a good interface through which the configuration, mapping, and so on can be done."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is a huge list of available connectors for a lot of different platforms, which we can use very easily."
"Whenever we need some support in our local language, we get it easily. They also have an office in Germany and if a person is unable to contact them by phone, they can go to the office in person."
"This is a good platform for designing, flowing out APIs, and then doing API-based integrations."
"The flexibility has been great overall."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is our preferred platform for integration."
"The exchange and API management features are the best in the market."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The solution is stable."
"The most valuable feature of SAP Process Orchestration is its flexibility in being able to build integrations with SAP systems and non-SAP systems."
"SAP Process Orchestration is middleware where we are able to manage and interact with everything from a single location. One of the most beneficial areas is monitoring which is very easy because it is all in one place. There are many adapters added recently that can be used for new functionality. The solution is easy to operate and it is more mature than the cloud solution provided by SAP."
"The solution provides very good and central logging systems. It offers high flexibility with vertical and horizontal extend capacity."
"The main benefit is that the solution is low maintenance. Moreover, it's the license cost is very low because it's part of the package. The maintenance is standard maintenance. And the updates are regular. So there's a regular update and you can choose whether you want to do those updates or not."
"The standard adapter with EBA abilities is the most valuable feature. It has good process integration."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"The stability could be better."
"One area we'd like to see improvement in is the error logging and troubleshooting process."
"Better documentation, in particular with respect to the initial setup, would be helpful."
"Pricing is one aspect of the solution that is troublesome. It's too expensive for smaller organizations."
"The runtime management and connectors could use some work and are vulnerable to breakage after upgrades."
"The solution's licensing methodologies could be improved."
"What I hear from my customers is that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites. The cost keeps increasing. MuleSoft should come up with customization factors by using a different way of getting the cost-related stuff to attract customers. That is, they should come up with some cost optimizations."
"An on-premise setup requires special skills and you need a lot of professional services."
"It requires some maintenance."
"Process Orchestration doesn't provide authentication for data sent to us, meaning we have to rely on client certificate-based or basic authentication."
"It is not a scalable solution for the cloud. I would not recommend this for the cloud."
"I feel that support is an area that needs improvement. They need to improve the response time and address the customer's issues as soon as possible."
"In terms of technical support, it would be helpful if they handled the tickets a bit faster when queries are sent to them."
"It's very difficult to find errors in a simple way."
"The solution needs to move to the cloud."
"The solution is not very scalable because it is at the end of its life."
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 2nd in Business-to-Business Middleware with 40 reviews while SAP Process Orchestration is ranked 1st in Business-to-Business Middleware with 28 reviews. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while SAP Process Orchestration is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Process Orchestration writes "A tool that can be useful for small integrations and large integrations". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Cloud Platform and Azure Data Factory, whereas SAP Process Orchestration is most compared with SAP Data Services, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, webMethods Integration Server, IBM B2B Integrator and TIBCO BusinessWorks. See our Mule Anypoint Platform vs. SAP Process Orchestration report.
See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
