We performed a comparison between Mule ESB and OpenText Trading Grid based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."Mule Expression Language"
"The most valuable feature is that it's programmer-friendly, so it's very easy to develop APIs."
"Mule ESB is a very easy-to-use and user-friendly solution."
"The most valuable feature for Mule is the number of connectors that are available."
"It was pretty fast to develop APIs on this platform, which is something I liked about it. So, the time to value was pretty good."
"The most valuable feature of Mule ESB is data transformation, i.e. our interacting with different systems and orchestrating for our business needs."
"What Mule provides out-of-box is a sufficient product."
"It is easily deployable and manageable. It has microservices-based architecture, which means that you can deploy the solution based on your needs, and you can manage the solution very easily."
"The solution is easy to implement."
"In an upcoming release, I would like to see more additional concept for exception handling, batch processing, and increased integration with other application."
"We would like to have a built-in logging framework in which we can do auditing."
"MuleSoft isn't as mature as some other integration technologies out there like IBM WebSphere. There's room for growth, and MuleSoft is working toward that."
"The price of Mule ESB could improve."
"The solution's setup needs to be a bit more straightforward and its support needs to respond faster."
"From the product perspective, it was sometimes hard to manage the dependencies. When we had to add dependencies on a couple of different packages, it was sometimes confusing. It was hard to update them with Anypoint Studio, as well as with MuleSoft. There were challenges with that. So, that's one of the areas that could be improved."
"The initial setup could be more straightforward."
"I would like to see support for BPM in the next release of this solution."
"Technical support needs to be better."
Mule ESB is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 45 reviews while OpenText Trading Grid is ranked 10th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 1 review. Mule ESB is rated 8.0, while OpenText Trading Grid is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Plenty of documentation, flexible, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Trading Grid writes "Industry-leading, easy to implement, and has good mapping specification guidelines". Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, Oracle SOA Suite, webMethods Integration Server and Red Hat Fuse, whereas OpenText Trading Grid is most compared with IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, TrueCommerce EDI, SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI), SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and SAP Cloud Platform.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
