We performed a comparison between Oracle Service Bus and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We've been pleased with the level of technical support."
"There are always continuous improvements that are happening."
"Overall it is a pretty good solution."
"Its ease of use is valuable. It's very easy to use. It's no code/low code. Oracle Middleware products are also rich in adapters."
"Service Bus is good at routing the transformation."
"What I found most valuable in Oracle Service Bus is its time to market. It's excellent."
"The stability is consistently high, with only one notable issue encountered."
"It was very good at supporting high transactions, up to 300 transactions per second."
"The solution has two main parts: integration and transformation. It's very user-friendly and easy to understand for everyone."
"The stability is excellent."
"It was mostly easy to set up the product."
"The solution's technical support is very knowledgeable."
"The solution's customer service is good."
"It's a consolidated product. It works and it does its job pretty well."
"WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide."
"Currently, I find the configuration part quite valuable, where you can easily configure things."
"The weak point of OSB is the single point of failure."
"Security needs to be more integrated."
"The support for GraphQL needs to be improved, and the response time for global support could be faster."
"There are some loopholes in service and support."
"Security features can be improved to better protect the server."
"This solution would benefit from having more cloud-based adapters."
"There are times when I select components in composite and they do not appear, and I cannot figure out why."
"An area for improvement in Oracle Service Bus is the roadmap for its product launch. Currently, it's unclear, so Oracle should develop a roadmap for version 12c, so people can see what's coming out of that version of Oracle Service Bus. Cloud hosting is an additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of Oracle Service Bus."
"I would like to see them bring back a feature, from earlier versions, that was very useful in debugging and finding issues."
"You cannot include the validation of XPath."
"The setup can be difficult for those not familiar with the solution."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The customization can be a bit difficult."
"The server is very specific and it is very difficult to get experience with it."
"There are a lot of security settings that when you apply you have to re-apply again every time you modify a setting. It is something that really needs to be enhanced."
"The integration capabilities need to be improved."
Oracle Service Bus is ranked 5th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 25 reviews while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is ranked 7th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 18 reviews. Oracle Service Bus is rated 7.8, while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Oracle Service Bus writes "Enables us to do a lot of aggregation and routing, but API response can be a problem if the payload is heavy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator writes "Consolidated, reliable, and has responsive technical support". Oracle Service Bus is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, Red Hat Fuse and TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus, whereas WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is most compared with Red Hat Fuse, IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, Talend Open Studio and Mule ESB. See our Oracle Service Bus vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator report.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
