We performed a comparison between MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager and webMethods.io API based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The auto-creation of the API documentation is useful."
"The scalability is good. It's passable."
"Anypoint is very capable in terms of scalability."
"The stability overall has been pretty great."
"If you adopt the whole platform, you can build composable applications. This will cut your time creating new applications and updating them – once you have everything running – by up to 50%."
"The most important features are the API management and API development."
"The tool has a private area. It also has a cloud deployment option."
"Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager's most valuable aspect is it has plenty of features."
"The performance is good."
"Clients choose webMethods.io API for its intuitive interface, promoting seamless interaction and quick communication between systems."
"The log management for this solution needs improvement."
"The initial setup, if you go back three or three and a half years, definitely, for us, was complex."
"Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager could improve the monitoring because it is very poor quality and not user-friendly. It is not as good as other solutions on the market."
"Rather than focusing on numbers, they should focus more on the customer support service."
"The product's price should be available for public review since it is not currently available for others to see, making it one of the areas where the product has certain shortcomings."
"One improvement is maybe to add a plugin in the API manager. Let's say an organisation is using SOAP services or legacy APIs. Maybe I don't want to migrate it to rest API, but my plugin should be able to convert Jason to XML. Basically, protocol transformation features in API Manager."
"When discussing potential enhancements overall, it primarily involves making it more user-friendly and lowering the pricing. There are several aspects that could benefit from improvement, or perhaps a few other areas to consider."
"The initial setup is very complex."
"I would like the solution to provide bi-weekly updates."
"A potential drawback of webMethods.io API is its adaptability to legacy systems, which can vary in compatibility."
More MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is ranked 4th in API Management with 47 reviews while webMethods.io API is ranked 30th in API Management with 2 reviews. MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is rated 8.2, while webMethods.io API is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager writes "Responsive technical support, low tickets issued showing great stability, and limitless expansion". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io API writes "Offers a strategic toolset for gradual integration advancement". MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, Amazon API Gateway, Apigee, IBM API Connect and Kong Gateway Enterprise, whereas webMethods.io API is most compared with Apigee. See our MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager vs. webMethods.io API report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.